Saffigna v Little

Saffigna was the driver of a small pantech truck that collided with Little's motorbike. Little sued Saffigna for damages. The tribunal found Saffigna liable for the damage to Little's motorbike and safety clothing, but did not find that the truck was damaged. Saffigna sought leave to appeal the decision. The nature of the dispute was the tribunal's findings of fact, particularly the lack of evidence of damage to the truck and Saffigna's liability for the damages.

The legal issues that the court needed to decide were whether the tribunal's findings of fact were open to challenge and whether there were any grounds for a grant of leave. The court also needed to determine whether there was any error of law or fact demonstrated. The court found that the tribunal's findings of fact were open to challenge, but there was no error of law or fact demonstrated. The court concluded that there were no grounds for a grant of leave and dismissed the application.

The court found that the tribunal's findings of fact were open on the evidence, but there was no error of law or fact demonstrated. The tribunal had considered all the evidence and had made findings of fact that were open to it. The court also found that there were no grounds for a grant of leave. The court held that the tribunal's findings of fact were not so unreasonable as to justify interference by the court. The court found that there was no basis to interfere with the tribunal's findings of fact. The court held that there were no grounds for a grant of leave and dismissed the application.

The final order of the court was that the application for leave to appeal was refused. The court held that there were no grounds for a grant of leave and dismissed the application. The tribunal's findings of fact were not so unreasonable as to justify interference by the court.