SafeWork NSW v Inghams Enterprises Pty Limited

Case

[2023] NSWDC 580

21 December 2023


Details
AGLC Case Decision Date
SafeWork NSW v Inghams Enterprises Pty Limited [2023] NSWDC 580 [2023] NSWDC 580 21 December 2023

CaseChat Overview and Summary

SafeWork NSW prosecuted Inghams Enterprises Pty Limited for breaches of work health and safety regulations in New South Wales. The case involved a serious incident at the company's workplace, which resulted in a worker suffering a severe injury. The defendant pleaded guilty to charges under the relevant legislation, and the matter was heard in the Local Court. The primary legal issue before the court was determining the appropriate penalty for the offence, taking into account the objective seriousness of the breach, the mitigating factors, and the aggravating factors. Additionally, the court had to consider the impact of the defendant’s guilty plea, the need for general and specific deterrence, and the demonstration of remorse and contrition by the defendant.

The court carefully evaluated the circumstances of the incident and the defendant’s actions leading up to it. It noted the significant harm caused to the worker and the failure of the defendant to adequately manage the risks associated with the workplace. The court found that the breach had an objective seriousness warranting a substantial penalty. However, it also acknowledged the defendant’s early guilty plea, which warranted a discount in the penalty. After considering all the relevant factors, the court determined that the most appropriate fine was $600,000. Given the plea of guilty, this was reduced by 25%, resulting in a fine of $450,000. The court also ordered that 50% of the fine be paid to the prosecutor and that the defendant pay the prosecutor’s costs, as agreed.

In summary, the court found the defendant guilty and imposed a fine of $450,000, reduced from $600,000 due to the plea of guilty. The court ordered that half of the fine be paid to the prosecutor and that the defendant also pay the prosecutor’s costs in the sum of $51,000. This decision reflects the court’s consideration of the gravity of the breach, the mitigating effect of the plea, and the need to uphold the principles of deterrence and accountability.
Details

Areas of Law

  • Criminal Law

Legal Concepts

  • Criminal Liability

  • Sentencing

  • Costs

Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document

Most Recent Citation
Agius v Hannaford [2025] ACTMC 19

Cases Citing This Decision

4

Agius v Hannaford [2025] ACTMC 19
Agius v Hannaford [2023] ACTMC 5
Agius v Hannaford [2025] ACTMC 19
Cases Cited

20

Statutory Material Cited

4