SafeWork NSW v Custom Bus Group Pty Ltd
Case
•
[2025] NSWDC 365
•17 September 2025
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
SafeWork NSW v Custom Bus Group Pty Ltd [2025] NSWDC 365
[2025] NSWDC 365
17 September 2025
CaseChat Overview and Summary
In the case of SafeWork NSW v Custom Bus Group Pty Ltd, the dispute arose from a tragic incident where a worker died, leading to a prosecution under the work health and safety laws. The court was tasked with determining whether the company breached its duty of care under the legislation, and if so, to impose an appropriate penalty. The primary legal issue was whether the company fulfilled its duty of care to prevent foreseeable risks that could result in death or serious injury, and if the prosecution's evidence sufficiently established a breach.
The court considered the principles of sentencing in the context of corporate offending. It evaluated the objective seriousness of the breach, taking into account the inherent risk to human life, and the potential for deterrence. The court also weighed various aggravating and mitigating factors, such as the company's lack of prior convictions, its prospects for rehabilitation, and the early guilty plea which demonstrated remorse. Additionally, the court assessed the company's capacity to pay and determined that the fine should reflect the seriousness of the breach while also considering the company's financial situation.
After thorough consideration of these factors, the court found Custom Bus Group Pty Ltd guilty of the charges. It imposed a fine of $170,000, ordered the company to pay the prosecutor's costs, and mandated that 50% of the fine be paid to the prosecutor as per the Fines Act 1996. The decision underscores the importance of employers adhering to work health and safety obligations and highlights the court's approach to sentencing in cases involving corporate offending.
The court considered the principles of sentencing in the context of corporate offending. It evaluated the objective seriousness of the breach, taking into account the inherent risk to human life, and the potential for deterrence. The court also weighed various aggravating and mitigating factors, such as the company's lack of prior convictions, its prospects for rehabilitation, and the early guilty plea which demonstrated remorse. Additionally, the court assessed the company's capacity to pay and determined that the fine should reflect the seriousness of the breach while also considering the company's financial situation.
After thorough consideration of these factors, the court found Custom Bus Group Pty Ltd guilty of the charges. It imposed a fine of $170,000, ordered the company to pay the prosecutor's costs, and mandated that 50% of the fine be paid to the prosecutor as per the Fines Act 1996. The decision underscores the importance of employers adhering to work health and safety obligations and highlights the court's approach to sentencing in cases involving corporate offending.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Criminal Law
Legal Concepts
-
Prosecution
-
Duty of Employers
-
Risk of Death or Serious Injury
-
Sentencing
-
Aggravating Factors
-
Mitigating Factors
-
Capacity to Pay a Fine
-
Appropriate Penalty
-
Plea of Guilty
-
Remorse
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Cases Citing This Decision
0
Cases Cited
6
Statutory Material Cited
3
Bulga Underground Operations Pty Ltd v Nash
[2016] NSWCCA 37
Mahdi Jahandideh v The Queen
[2014] NSWCCA 178
Kirk v Industrial Court of New South Wales
[2010] HCA 1