SafeWork NSW v CNH Management Pty Ltd
Case
•
[2025] NSWDC 371
•16 May 2025
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
SafeWork NSW v CNH Management Pty Ltd [2025] NSWDC 371
[2025] NSWDC 371
16 May 2025
CaseChat Overview and Summary
In SafeWork NSW v CNH Management Pty Ltd, the dispute involved a prosecution against CNH Management Pty Ltd and its director, Carlos Hadidi, for breaches of work health and safety laws. The case was heard and determined by the Industrial Relations Commission of New South Wales. The charges stemmed from incidents that led to serious injury of a worker, raising issues about the duty of care owed by employers and persons undertaking business under work health and safety legislation.
The court was tasked with deciding the objective seriousness of the offences, considering factors such as the risk of death or serious injury to the worker, and determining appropriate penalties. Sentencing principles included the offenders’ previous criminal records, prospects for rehabilitation, expressions of remorse, and their cooperation with authorities. The court also weighed the capacity of the offenders to pay fines and the need for deterrence and parity in sentencing.
The court found both CNH Management Pty Ltd and Carlos Hadidi guilty. CNH Management Pty Ltd was fined $225,000, with half of this amount to be paid to the prosecutor as per the Fines Act 1996. Carlos Hadidi was fined $20,000, with half of this also payable to the prosecutor. Additionally, both offenders were ordered to pay the prosecutor’s costs of the proceedings. The court emphasised the importance of compliance with work health and safety duties to protect workers and the need for penalties that reflect the seriousness of the breaches.
The court was tasked with deciding the objective seriousness of the offences, considering factors such as the risk of death or serious injury to the worker, and determining appropriate penalties. Sentencing principles included the offenders’ previous criminal records, prospects for rehabilitation, expressions of remorse, and their cooperation with authorities. The court also weighed the capacity of the offenders to pay fines and the need for deterrence and parity in sentencing.
The court found both CNH Management Pty Ltd and Carlos Hadidi guilty. CNH Management Pty Ltd was fined $225,000, with half of this amount to be paid to the prosecutor as per the Fines Act 1996. Carlos Hadidi was fined $20,000, with half of this also payable to the prosecutor. Additionally, both offenders were ordered to pay the prosecutor’s costs of the proceedings. The court emphasised the importance of compliance with work health and safety duties to protect workers and the need for penalties that reflect the seriousness of the breaches.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Criminal Law
Legal Concepts
-
Sentencing
-
Aggravating Factors
-
Mitigating Factors
-
Capacity to Pay a Fine
-
Parity
-
Appropriate Penalty
-
Remorse
-
Plea of Guilty
-
Assistance to Law Enforcement Authorities
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Cases Citing This Decision
0
Cases Cited
5
Statutory Material Cited
4
Bulga Underground Operations Pty Ltd v Nash
[2016] NSWCCA 37
Mahdi Jahandideh v The Queen
[2014] NSWCCA 178
Lacey v Attorney-General (Qld)
[2011] HCA 10