SABINA & SABINA

In *Sabina & Sabina*, Hannam J of the Supreme Court of New South Wales was required to determine whether to proceed with a hearing on an ex parte or undefended basis. The nature of the underlying dispute between the parties is not detailed in the provided text.

The central legal issue before the Court was the appropriate procedural path for the proceedings, specifically whether the matter could be heard and determined in the absence of one of the parties or without opposition.

Hannam J ordered that the matter be dealt with on an ex parte or undefended basis. This indicates that the Court was satisfied that the conditions for proceeding in such a manner had been met, allowing the case to move forward without the full participation or opposition of all parties.