FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
S413 of 2003 v Refugee Review Tribunal [2004] FCA 669
S413 OF 2003 v REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL & ANOR
N 2531 OF 2003
EMMETT J
9 FEBRUARY 2004
SYDNEY
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY
N 2531 OF 2003
ON REMITTAL FROM THE HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIA
BETWEEN:
S413 OF 2003
APPLICANTAND:
REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL
FIRST RESPONDENTMINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & MULTICULTURAL & INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS
SECOND RESPONDENTJUDGE:
EMMETT J
DATE OF ORDER:
9 FEBRUARY 2004
WHERE MADE:
SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. Order 51A r 5(1) of the Federal Court Rules not apply.
2. The application for an order nisi be refused.
Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY
N 2531 OF 2003
ON REMITTAL FROM THE HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIA
BETWEEN:
S413 OF 2003
APPLICANT
AND:
REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL
FIRST RESPONDENTMINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & MULTICULTURAL & INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS
SECOND RESPONDENTJUDGE:
EMMETT J
DATE:
9 FEBRUARY 2004
PLACE:
SYDNEY
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
On 18 July 2003 a draft order nisi supported by an affidavit was filed in the High Court of Australia. The applicant sought constitutional writ relief in respect of a decision of the Refugee Review Tribunal (‘the Tribunal’) given on 1 February 2000. By consent, Gummow J ordered on 25 November 2003 that the further proceedings in the application be remitted to this Court.
The matter is therefore before this Court as an application for an order nisi. The matter was listed for directions today. The solicitor for the applicant indicated that it was necessary to file an application disclosing some basis for relief. The reason why such an application was made is that the affidavit, on its face, discloses no basis upon which any relief can be granted.
The appropriate course is to refuse an order nisi. The respondents to the application seek costs. The matter was remitted by consent without the question of refusal of an order nisi being raised and in the circumstances I consider it is appropriate not to make an order as to costs.
I certify that the preceding three (3) numbered paragraphs are a true copy of the Reasons for Judgment herein of the Honourable Justice Emmett. Associate:
Dated: 3 June 2004
Solicitor for the Applicant: Ward Maxwell & Co Solicitor for the Respondent: Australian Government Solicitor Date of Hearing: 9 February 2004 Date of Judgment: 9 February 2004
- AGLC
- S413 of 2003 v Refugee Review Tribunal [2004] FCA 669
- Case
- [2004] FCA 669
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issues revolved around the interpretation of the Migration Act and whether the Tribunal had the authority to make certain findings in its decision. The applicant argued that the Tribunal had misinterpreted the provisions, leading to an unjust outcome. The central question was whether the Tribunal's interpretation and application of the statutory provisions were correct, and if the Tribunal had acted beyond its jurisdictional powers.
The court considered the statutory language and relevant case law to determine the correct interpretation of the Migration Act provisions. The court held that the Tribunal's interpretation of the relevant sections was consistent with the statutory language and existing judicial precedents. It found that the Tribunal had not acted beyond its jurisdictional powers and that its decision was based on a proper interpretation of the law. Consequently, the court dismissed the application for judicial review and refused the order nisi. The court held that the Tribunal's decision was lawful and that no error of law had been made.
Orders
Orders of the court
1. Order 51A r 5(1) of the Federal Court Rules not apply.
2. The application for an order nisi be refused.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Established by: EMMETT J
Full text does not contain this section.