FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
S382 of 2003 v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2004] FCA 670
S382 OF 2003 v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & MULTICULTURAL & INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS & ORS
N 2535 OF 2003
EMMETT J
9 FEBRUARY 2004
SYDNEY
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY
N 2535 OF 2003
ON REMITTAL FROM THE HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIA
BETWEEN:
S382 OF 2003
APPLICANTAND:
MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & MULTICULTURAL & INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS
FIRST RESPONDENTPRINCIPAL MEMBER OF THE REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL
SECOND RESPONDENTKIM ROSSER, MEMBER OF THE REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL
THIRD RESPONDENTJUDGE:
EMMETT J
DATE OF ORDER:
9 FEBRUARY 2004
WHERE MADE:
SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. Order 51A r 5(1) of the Federal Court Rules not apply.
2. The application for an order nisi be refused.
3. The applicant pay the Minister’s costs.
Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY
N 2535 OF 2003
ON REMITTAL FROM THE HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIA
BETWEEN:
S382 OF 2003
APPLICANT
AND:
MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & MULTICULTURAL & INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS
FIRST RESPONDENTPRINCIPAL MEMBER OF THE REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL
SECOND RESPONDENTKIM ROSSER, MEMBER OF THE REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL
THIRD RESPONDENTJUDGE:
EMMETT J
DATE:
9 FEBRUARY 2004
PLACE:
SYDNEY
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
On 30 June 2003 the applicant filed in the High Court a draft order nisi and an affidavit sworn on 25 June 2003. The proceeding was commenced for constitutional writ relief in respect of a decision of the Refugee Review Tribunal (‘the Tribunal’) made on 1 June 2000 affirming a decision not to grant a protection visa to the applicant and members of his family. The matter was remitted to this Court by Heydon J on 12 November 2003. The affidavit in support of the draft order nisi disclosed no basis upon which any relief could be granted.
When the matter was called on for directions today there was no appearance for the applicant. In the circumstances I propose to refuse an order nisi and to order the applicant to pay the Minister’s costs.
I certify that the preceding two (2) numbered paragraphs are a true copy of the Reasons for Judgment herein of the Honourable Justice Emmett. Associate:
Dated: 31 May 2004
Counsel for the Applicant: The applicant did not appear Solicitor for the Respondent: Australian Government Solicitor Date of Hearing: 9 February 2004 Date of Judgment: 9 February 2004
- AGLC
- S382 of 2003 v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2004] FCA 670
- Case
- [2004] FCA 670
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues before the court encompassed whether the Minister's decision was legally sound, whether the applicant's rights under relevant legislative provisions were respected, and if the decision-making process adhered to procedural fairness. The applicant argued that the Minister failed to consider pertinent information and that the decision was unreasonable. The Minister contended that the decision was based on lawful grounds and that the applicant's arguments lacked merit.
The court examined the merits of the applicant's claims and the evidence presented. It concluded that the Minister's decision was not unlawful and was made in accordance with the applicable legislation and principles of natural justice. The court found that the Minister had appropriately considered the relevant factors and that the applicant's contentions did not establish a basis for setting aside the decision. The court ruled against the applicant, dismissing the application and ordering the applicant to pay the Minister's costs.
Orders
Orders of the court
1. Order 51A r 5(1) of the Federal Court Rules not apply.
2. The application for an order nisi be refused.
3. The applicant pay the Minister’s costs.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Established by: EMMETT J
Full text does not contain this section.