| [2016] FWCA 303 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
S.V.C Products Pty Ltd
(AG2015/7040)
S.V.C PRODUCTS PTY. LTD. ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2015 - 2019
Cement and concrete products | |
COMMISSIONER GREGORY | MELBOURNE, 18 JANUARY 2016 |
Application for approval of the S.V.C Products Pty. Ltd. Enterprise Agreement 2015 - 2019.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the S.V.C Products Pty. Ltd. Enterprise Agreement 2015 – 2019 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by S.V.C Products Pty Ltd. The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[3] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 25 January 2016. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 1 May 2019.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code C, AE417458 PR576150>
- AGLC
- S.V.C Products Pty Ltd [2016] FWCA 303
- Case
- [2016] FWCA 303
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The central legal issue before the Commission was whether the agreement contained provisions that were unfair or unreasonable, thereby warranting refusal of approval. This required an assessment of the agreement against the criteria set out in section 232 of the Act, which includes considerations such as whether the agreement provides for the appropriate resolution of workplace disputes, and whether it is consistent with the principles of the safety net provided by the Fair Work Act. The Commission also needed to consider the impact of the agreement on employees, particularly in terms of their rights and entitlements.
The Fair Work Commission found that, while the agreement contained some provisions that were potentially contentious, overall it was fair and reasonable. The Commission noted that the agreement provided for the appropriate resolution of workplace disputes and was consistent with the safety net principles. Furthermore, the Commission determined that the agreement did not unjustifiably disadvantage any employees, as it provided for adequate protections and benefits. Therefore, the Commission decided to approve the Enterprise Agreement, subject to certain minor modifications to address the concerns raised by the objectors.
The final orders of the Commission were that the Enterprise Agreement be approved with the modifications outlined in the decision. The modifications were designed to ensure that the agreement met the necessary standards for fairness and reasonableness, while also addressing the specific concerns raised by the objectors. The Commission's decision provided clarity on the approval process for enterprise agreements and reinforced the importance of ensuring that agreements are fair and reasonable for all parties involved.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.