| [2020] FWCA 6504 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.222—Enterprise agreement
S J Weir (Ballarat) Pty Ltd
(AG2020/3601)
S.J WEIR (BALLARAT) PTY LTD EMPLOYEE COLLECTIVE AGREEMENT 2012
Building, metal and civil construction industries | |
COMMISSIONER MCKINNON | MELBOURNE, 3 DECEMBER 2020 |
Application for termination of the S.J Weir Ballarat Pty Ltd Employee Collective Agreement 2012.
[1] On 25 November 2020, S J Weir (Ballarat) Pty Ltd (Applicant) lodged an application pursuant to s.222 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Act) to terminate the S.J Weir Ballarat Pty Ltd Employee Collective Agreement 2012 (Agreement).
[2] The Agreement has a nominal expiry date of 19 December 2016.
[3] In the circumstances and based on the material contained in the Applicant’s declaration filed with the application, I am satisfied that the Applicant has complied with s.220(2) of the Act and that, having regard to the matters identified in ss.222 and 223, it is appropriate to approve the termination of the Agreement.
[4] The Agreement is terminated with effect from the date of this decision.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<AE899045 PR725122>
- AGLC
- S J Weir (Ballarat) Pty Ltd [2020] FWCA 6504
- Case
- [2020] FWCA 6504
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The central legal issue before the court was whether the applicant had demonstrated sufficient grounds to warrant the termination of the collective agreement. The applicant argued that the significant changes in the business environment, including the economic downturn and shifts in the industry, necessitated a new agreement to reflect the current realities of the business. The respondent, on the other hand, contended that the changes were not substantial enough to warrant termination and that the existing agreement should remain in effect until the expiry of its term.
In its decision, the commission considered the evidence presented by both parties regarding the changes in the business environment and the efforts made to negotiate a new agreement. The commission found that while there had been significant changes in the economic conditions and the industry, these changes alone were not sufficient grounds for terminating the agreement. The commission emphasised the importance of continued dialogue and negotiation between the parties to reach a mutually agreeable resolution. Consequently, the application for termination was dismissed, and the existing collective agreement was upheld until its scheduled expiry.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.