Ryan v The Minister for Planning

Case [2015] NSWLEC 88


Land and Environment Court


New South Wales

Medium Neutral Citation: Ryan v The Minister for Planning [2015] NSWLEC 88
Hearing dates:1 December 2014; written submissions 20 May 2015
Date of orders: 05 June 2015
Decision date: 05 June 2015
Jurisdiction:Class 4
Before: Sheahan J
Decision:

(1)I declare that Lismore Local Environmental Plan 2012 (Amendment No 3), published on the New South Wales legislation website on 21 February 2014, is invalid and of no effect.
(2)I order the first respondent to pay the applicant’s costs of these proceedings, as agreed or assessed.
(3)All Exhibits and Court Books are returned.

Catchwords: JUDICIAL REVIEW – challenge to making of a local environmental plan – whether the LEP as made is “significantly” different from the publicly exhibited proposal – invalidity – the LEP must remain “a product” of the LEP making process under the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 – the impugned LEP differed in material respects to the exhibited proposal and was therefore not a “product of the process” – LEP invalid
Legislation Cited: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979
Greater Metropolitan Regional Environmental Plan No 1 – Redevelopment of Urban Land
Lismore Local Environmental Plan 2000
Lismore Local Environmental Plan 2012
Local Government Act 1993
Manly Local Environmental Plan 2013
Cases Cited: Bryan v Lane Cove Council [2007] NSWLEC 586; 158 LGERA 390
Chief Executive Officer of Customs v Tony Longo Pty Ltd (t/as Aquila Shoes) [2001] NSWCA 147; 52 NSWLR 458
DeAngelis v Pepping [2014] NSWLEC 108; 203 LGERA 61
El Cheikh v Hurstville City Council [2002] NSWCA 173; 121 LGERA 293
Friends of Turramurra Inc v Minister for Planning [2011] NSWLEC 128
John Brown Lenton & Co Pty Ltd v Minister for Urban Affairs and Planning [1999] NSWLEC 213; 106 LGERA 150
Leichhardt Council v Minister for Planning (No 2) (1995) 87 LGERA 78
Save Little Manly Beach Foreshore Incorporated v Manly Council (No 2) [2013] NSWLEC 156
Save Little Manly Beach Foreshore Incorporated v Manly Council (No 3) [2015] NSWLEC 77
Smith v Wyong Shire Council [2003] NSWCA 322; 132 LGERA 148
Soong v Deputy Commissioner of Taxation [2011] NSWCA 26; 80 NSWLR 226
Vanmeld Pty Ltd v Fairfield City Council [1999] NSWCA 6; 46 NSWLR 78
Category:Principal judgment
Parties: Michael Ryan (Applicant)
The Minister for Planning (First Respondent)
Secretary of the Department of Planning (Third Respondent)
Lismore City Council (Fourth Respondent – submitting)
The Plateau Group (TPG) Pty Ltd (Sixth Respondent –submitting)
Representation:

Counsel:

P Clay, SC with N Hammond, barrister (Applicant)
K Richardson, barrister (First and Third Respondents)

Solicitors:

Environment Defenders Office New South Wales (Applicant)
Department of Planning (First and Third Respondents)
Marsdens Law Group (Fourth Respondent)
Norton Rose Fulbright Australia (Sixth Respondent)
File Number(s):40334 of 2014

Judgment

A: Introduction

  1. This is a judicial review challenge to the validity of a plan made by way of an amendment (“Amendment 3”) to the Local Environmental Plan 2012 (“LEP”) for the City of Lismore, concerning,…

Continue reading Ryan v The Minister for Planning

Sign in free to access the full text

Details
AGLC
Ryan v The Minister for Planning [2015] NSWLEC 88
Case
[2015] NSWLEC 88
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the case of Ryan v The Minister for Planning, the applicant challenged the validity of the Lismore Local Environmental Plan 2012 (Amendment No 3). The dispute arose from the alleged failure of the Minister for Planning to adhere to the statutory requirements for the amendment of local environmental plans, specifically the need for public consultation as mandated by the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 (NSW). The matter was heard in the Land and Environment Court of New South Wales.

The primary legal issue for the court to determine was whether the Minister for Planning complied with the mandatory requirements for public consultation when amending the local environmental plan. The applicant argued that the public consultation process was inadequate and did not meet the statutory obligations. The Minister contended that the consultation was sufficient and that the amendment was properly made.

The court found that the Minister did not comply with the statutory requirement for public consultation as outlined in the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979. The court emphasised the importance of public participation in the planning process and noted that the consultation process in this case did not meet the necessary standards. Consequently, the court declared the Lismore Local Environmental Plan 2012 (Amendment No 3) to be invalid and of no effect. The Minister was ordered to pay the applicant’s costs of the proceedings.

Orders

Orders of the court

(1)I declare that Lismore Local Environmental Plan 2012 (Amendment No 3), published on the New South Wales legislation website on 21 February 2014, is invalid and of no effect.

(2)I order the first respondent to pay the applicant’s costs of these proceedings, as agreed or assessed.

(3)All Exhibits and Court Books are returned.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.