Russell & Close
Case
•
[1993] FamCA 62
•31 March 1993
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Russell & Close [1993] FamCA 62
[1993] FamCA 62
31 March 1993
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The Full Federal Court, comprising Fogarty, Baker and Lindenmayer JJ, heard an appeal concerning a dispute between Russell and Close. The precise nature of the dispute and the parties' respective roles are not detailed in the provided text.
The central legal issue before the Full Federal Court was the determination of the appeal brought by one of the parties. The court was required to consider the grounds of appeal and decide whether to uphold or overturn the decision of the lower court.
The court's reasoning and the legal principles applied in reaching its decision are not elaborated upon in the provided text. However, the outcome indicates that the court found no error in the decision under appeal.
The appeal was dismissed, and the appellant was ordered to pay the costs of the respondent.
The central legal issue before the Full Federal Court was the determination of the appeal brought by one of the parties. The court was required to consider the grounds of appeal and decide whether to uphold or overturn the decision of the lower court.
The court's reasoning and the legal principles applied in reaching its decision are not elaborated upon in the provided text. However, the outcome indicates that the court found no error in the decision under appeal.
The appeal was dismissed, and the appellant was ordered to pay the costs of the respondent.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Civil Procedure
Legal Concepts
-
Appeal
-
Costs
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Citations
Russell & Close [1993] FamCA 62
Most Recent Citation
Chau & Geng [2021] FedCFamC2F 537
Cases Citing This Decision
81
Sedgwick & Lind
[2021] FamCA 605
Fox & Nevin
[2021] FamCA 526
Tabakin & Tabakin
[2021] FamCA 172
Cases Cited
2
Statutory Material Cited
2
Jones v Grech
[2001] NSWCA 208
Jones v Grech
[2001] NSWCA 208
Lovell v Lovell
[1950] HCA 52