Russell and Russell (No. 3)

In *Russell and Russell (No. 3)*, Young J of the Family Court of Australia was required to make orders concerning the future conduct of proceedings between a husband and wife. The specific dispute leading to these orders is not detailed, but the judgment indicates it involved jurisdictional and legal issues, as well as the production of a child's passport.

The court was tasked with determining the appropriate procedural steps to advance the case, including how to effect service of documents on the husband, particularly given his location in India. It also needed to address the production of the child's Indian passport and to set a timetable for the filing of written submissions on key legal and jurisdictional matters.

Young J's reasoning focused on ensuring effective communication and procedural fairness for both parties, especially the husband who was overseas. The orders reflect a practical approach to managing the case, including directing service by post to India and by email, and requiring the husband to provide the child's passport to the wife's solicitors. The court also made orders for the wife's costs and certified the need for counsel's attendance.