Rudd and Riddick

In *Rudd and Riddick*, heard before Cronin J, the applicant sought to vary paragraph 2 of existing orders made on 28 November 2018. The respondent filed a reply to the applicant's written submission.

The central legal issue before the Court was whether the applicant had established sufficient grounds to warrant a variation of the prior orders concerning paragraph 2.

Cronin J dismissed the applicant's application. The Court's reasoning and the specific legal principles applied in reaching this conclusion are not detailed in the provided text, beyond the ultimate outcome.

The application by way of written submission filed by the applicant on 19 December 2018, to which the respondent replied on 2 January 2019, arising out of paragraph 2 of the orders of 28 November 2018, was dismissed.