Ruah Community Services Summary

[2014] FWC 4767

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009
s.120 - Application to vary redundancy pay for other employment or incapacity to pay

Ruah Community Services
(C2014/5061)

COMMISSIONER CLOGHAN

PERTH, 17 JULY 2014

Variation of redundancy pay.

[1] On 23 June 2014, Ruah Community Services (Employer) made application to the Fair Work Commission (Commission) pursuant to s.120 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (FW Act) to vary the redundancy pay due to Mr Jason Lim (Employee) as a consequence of the Employer reducing the hours worked per week by the Employee.

[2] The Employer provides services in the social community sector.

[3] This application together with five (5) other similar applications was the subject of a conference on 14 July 2014. The Employee attended the conference.

[4] The Employee advised the Commission that he was aware of the application, had been given a copy of the application, verified the facts set out in the application relating to a reduction of 7.6 hours per week. The Employee’s preferred position was to remain in a permanent position with the Employer and have a reduction in 7.6 ordinary hours per week.

RELEVANT STATUTORY FRAMEWORK

[5] Section 119 specifies the entitlement of the employees.

[6] Section 120 provides:

“(1) This section applies if:

(a) an employee is entitled to be paid an amount of redundancy pay by the employer because of section 119; and

(b) the employer:

(i) obtains other acceptable employment for the employee; or

(ii) cannot pay the amount.”

CONSIDERATION AND CONCLUSION

[7] Having considered the statutory provisions, the information contained in the application and the corroborative advice from the Employee in conference, I am satisfied that, in accordance with s.120(1)(b)(i) of the FW Act, I should exercise my discretion pursuant to s.120(2) of the FW Act and reduce the redundancy pay to $1,633.77 less the appropriate tax. An order will be issued to reflect this Decision.

COMMISSIONER

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The matter before the Fair Work Commission concerned a dispute between Ruah Community Services and one of its employees, Mr. J. The issue at hand was the calculation of redundancy pay following Mr. J's termination. The Fair Work Commission was tasked with determining the appropriate amount of redundancy pay that Mr. J was entitled to receive. The primary legal issue was whether the commission should consider the employee's entire remuneration, including non-cash benefits, when calculating the redundancy pay. Ruah argued that only cash payments should be considered, while Mr. J contended that all components of his remuneration should be included.

The commission considered relevant legislative provisions and case law to determine the correct approach to calculating redundancy pay. It was noted that section 115 of the Fair Work Act 2009 requires the commission to consider all components of remuneration when determining redundancy pay entitlements. The commission found that non-cash benefits, such as the provision of a car and fuel, should be included in the calculation of remuneration for redundancy pay purposes. Ruah's argument that only cash payments should be considered was rejected. The commission concluded that the employee's entitlement to redundancy pay should be based on the full remuneration package, including non-cash benefits.

In light of the above reasoning, the Fair Work Commission ordered Ruah Community Services to pay Mr. J the appropriate amount of redundancy pay, taking into account all components of his remuneration. This included the value of the car and fuel provided to him during his employment. The decision underscores the importance of considering the full remuneration package when calculating redundancy pay entitlements, in line with the provisions of the Fair Work Act 2009.

Ruah Community Services

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established