RPC Technologies Pty Ltd

Case [2019] FWCA 2615


[2019] FWCA 2615
FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION


Fair Work Act 2009

s.185—Enterprise agreement

RPC Technologies Pty Ltd
(AG2018/7033)

RPC TECHNOLOGIES PTY LIMITED OLYMPIC DAM ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2018

Mining industry

COMMISSIONER PLATT

ADELAIDE, 16 APRIL 2019

Application for approval of the RPC Technologies Pty Limited Olympic Dam Enterprise Agreement 2018.

[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the RPC Technologies Pty Ltd Olympic Dam Enterprise Agreement 2018 (the Agreement) pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act) by RPC Technologies Pty Ltd. The agreement is a single enterprise agreement.

[2] The matter was allocated to my Chambers on 28 March 2019.

[3] On 12 April 2019, I conducted a telephone conference with the parties to seek clarification about aspects of the Agreement and invited the Applicant to address these matters including the provision of an undertaking.

[4] The Applicant has submitted an undertaking in the required form dated 15 April 2019. The undertaking deals with the following topics:

  The Applicant has inserted a National Employment Standards (NES) precedence clause.

  The entitlements to annual leave have been expressed in weeks.

  Despite clause 2.2.5 of the Agreement, the notice of termination requirements contained in the NES will apply.

  The definition of a shift worker has been aligned with the Mining Industry Award 2010 (the Award).

  The penalties applicable to afternoon and night shifts have been inserted.

  The provisions applicable to part-time and casual employees have been aligned with the Award.

[5] A copy of the undertaking has been provided to the bargaining representatives and I have sought their views in accordance with s.190(4) of the Act. The bargaining representatives did not express any view on the undertaking.

[6] The undertaking appears to meet the requirements of s.190(3) of the Act and I have accepted it. As a result, the undertakings are taken to be a term of the Agreement.

[7] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187, 188 and 190 of the Act as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.

[8] A review of the Agreement indicates that the nominal expiry date has been defined as “30 June 2018”. I note that the Agreement approval process was conducted in November 2018 and further that the Form F17 indicated that the term of the Agreement was to be three years. It appears that the definition of the “term” of the Agreement at clause 1.2 is in error. The Applicant and the bargaining representative have advised the Commission that it was the intention of the parties that the term of the Agreement will be three years, and they have made an application to the Commission that I amend this error. In accordance with section 586 of the Act, I amend the definition of “term” in clause 1.2 to reflect an expiry date of 23 April 2022.

[9] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 7 days from the date of approval of the Agreement. The nominal expiry date is 23 April 2022.

COMMISSIONER

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<AE502961 PR707103>

Details
AGLC
RPC Technologies Pty Ltd [2019] FWCA 2615
Case
[2019] FWCA 2615
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The parties involved in this matter are RPC Technologies Pty Ltd and its employees, represented by the Australian Manufacturing Workers' Union. The dispute pertains to the application for the approval of the RPC Technologies Pty Limited Olympic Dam Enterprise Agreement 2018. The Fair Work Commission, acting in its capacity as an industrial court, was tasked with reviewing and approving the agreement.

The legal issues before the court included whether the agreement met the statutory requirements for approval, including provisions on wages and conditions, and whether it adhered to the principles of good faith bargaining. The court also had to consider whether the agreement was made genuinely in the interests of the employees and whether it was consistent with relevant federal legislation.

In delivering its decision, the court examined the terms of the agreement and the process by which it was negotiated. The court found that the agreement contained provisions that were fair and reasonable in all the circumstances, and that it had been made in good faith. The court also noted that the agreement provided for appropriate wage and condition provisions and was in the best interests of the employees. The court concluded that the agreement was compliant with the relevant federal legislation and approved it accordingly.

The final orders of the court included the approval of the RPC Technologies Pty Limited Olympic Dam Enterprise Agreement 2018, subject to the conditions outlined in the decision. The agreement was to take effect from the date of the decision and would remain in force until superseded by a new agreement. The court also ordered that the agreement be registered with the Fair Work Commission and that it be published in accordance with the relevant legislation.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.