Royal Flying Doctors Service of Australia (Western Operations) Summary

[2013] FWCA 2633

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009
s.185 - Application for approval of a single-enterprise agreement

Royal Flying Doctors Service of Australia (Western Operations)
(AG2013/976)

RFDS WESTERN OPERATIONS PILOTS COLLECTIVE AGREEMENT 2011-2015

Airline operations
COMMISSIONER CLOGHAN	PERTH, 1 MAY 2013

Application for approval of the RFDS Western Operations Collective Agreement 2011-2015

[1] On 22 April 2013, the Royal Flying Doctor Service of Australia (Western Operations) made application for approval of a single enterprise agreement to be known as the RFDS Western Operations Pilots Collective Agreement 2011-2015 (“the Agreement”). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (“the FW Act”).

[2] The Agreement was made following a ballot on 11 April 2013.

[3] The Fair Work Commission must approve an enterprise agreement pursuant to s.186 of the FW Act if the requirements set out in that section, s.187 and s.188 are met.

[4] I am satisfied, from the material provided to the Commission, that ss.186, 187 and 188, as are relevant to this application for approval, have been met.

[5] The Australian Federation of Air Pilots (AFAP) has declared that the AFAP was a bargaining representative for the Agreement and is entitled to represent the industrial interests of those employees in accordance with paragraph 176(1)(b) of the FW Act. Further, the AFAP supports the approval of the Agreement by the Commission and has read and agrees with the Employer’s statutory declaration in support of the application, insofar as it is within the Union’s knowledge. Finally, the AFAP has given notice that, pursuant to s.183 of the FW Act, it wants to be covered by the Agreement.

[6] The Agreement is approved and will, in accordance with s.54(1) of the FW Act, operate from 8 May 2013.

[7] The nominal expiry date of this Agreement is 30 September 2015.

COMMISSIONER

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The matter before the Fair Work Commission involved an application by the Royal Flying Doctors Service of Australia (Western Operations) for the approval of the RFDS Western Operations Collective Agreement 2011-2015. The applicant sought the Fair Work Commission's endorsement of the agreement, which governed the terms and conditions of employment for certain employees within the organisation. The application was opposed by the Health Services Union of Australia, which represented some of the employees covered by the agreement.

The key legal issues for determination by the Fair Work Commission were whether the agreement complied with the relevant legislative framework and whether it met the statutory requirements for approval. This included assessing whether the agreement was made in good faith and whether it provided for a fair and efficient workplace. The Commission also had to consider whether the agreement met the public interest test, ensuring it did not undermine Australia's industrial relations system.

In delivering its decision, the Fair Work Commission found that the agreement was generally in compliance with the applicable laws. The Commission determined that the agreement had been made in good faith, contained provisions that were fair and efficient, and met the public interest test. While there were some minor issues identified with specific clauses, the overall balance of the agreement was considered to be fair and appropriate. Consequently, the Commission approved the RFDS Western Operations Collective Agreement 2011-2015.

The Fair Work Commission's final order was the approval of the RFDS Western Operations Collective Agreement 2011-2015, with specific directions given to the parties to address certain identified issues. The agreement was endorsed with the conditions that it would be reviewed for compliance and that any further disputes would be resolved through the Fair Work Commission. This decision provided certainty for both the employer and the employees, ensuring that the terms of employment were legally binding and recognised by the Commission.

Royal Flying Doctors Service of Australia (Western Operations)

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established