Royal Flying Doctor Service Of Australia (Queensland Section) Limited T/A Royal Flying Doctor Service Of Australia (Queensland Section) Limited

Case [2024] FWCA 2922


[2024] FWCA 2922

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009

s.185—Enterprise agreement

Royal Flying Doctor Service Of Australia (Queensland Section) Limited T/A Royal Flying Doctor Service Of Australia (Queensland Section) Limited

(AG2024/2769)

ROYAL FLYING DOCTOR SERVICE OF AUSTRALIA (QUEENSLAND SECTION) LIMITED MENTAL HEALTH PROFESSIONALS ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2024

Health and welfare services

DEPUTY PRESIDENT DOBSON

BRISBANE, 8 AUGUST 2024

Application for approval of the Royal Flying Doctor Service of Australia (Queensland Section) Limited Mental Health Professionals Enterprise Agreement 2024

  1. An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Royal Flying Doctor Service of Australia (Queensland Section) Limited Enterprise Agreement 2024 (the Agreement). The Application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Royal Flying Doctor Service of Australia (Queensland Section) Limited (the Applicant). The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.

  1. The Notice of Employee Representational Rights (NERR) distributed to employees appears to have been the previous version. However, I am satisfied that the Agreement would have been genuinely agreed to but for the minor procedural departure from the prescribed form requirements of the NERR under s.174(1A) of the Act and that the employees covered by the Agreement were not likely to have been disadvantaged by this. Accordingly, I exercise the discretion conferred by s.188(5) of the Act.[1]

  1. The Agreement does not contain a delegates rights term that is no less favourable than the modern award, pursuant to s.205A, and on that basis the term in the relevant modern award will apply.

  1. The Applicant has provided written undertakings. I am satisfied that the undertakings will not cause financial detriment to any employee covered by the Agreement and that the undertakings will not result in substantial changes to the Agreement.

  1. The views of each person who the Fair Work Commission knows is a bargaining representative for the Agreement have been sought in relation to the Undertakings.

  1. Pursuant to s.190(3) of the Act, I accept the undertakings.

  1. Subject to the undertakings referred to above, having regard to the Statement of Principles,[2] on the basis of the material contained in the application and accompanying declarations, I am satisfied that each requirement of ss186, 187 and 188 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met. The undertakings are taken to be a term of the Agreement.

  1. I observe that the following provisions are likely to be inconsistent with the National Employment Standards (NES):

·   Clause 31.1 – Annual Leave accrual.

  1. However, noting clause 8.1 of the Agreement, I am satisfied the more beneficial entitlements of the NES will prevail where there is an inconsistency between the Agreement and the NES.

  1. The Australian Municipal, Administrative, Clerical and Services Union (Services and Northern Administrative Branch) (ASU) lodged a Form F18 statutory declaration giving notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2) of the Act, I note the Agreement covers the ASU.

  1. The Agreement is approved and will operate in accordance with s.54 of the Act. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 7 August 2028.

DEPUTY PRESIDENT


[1] Huntsman Chemical Company Australia Pty Limited T/A RMAX Rigid Cellular Plastics & Others[2019] FWCFB 318 [117].

[2] Fair Work (Statement of Principles on Genuine Agreement) Instrument 2023.

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<AE525736  PR778146>

Details
AGLC
Royal Flying Doctor Service Of Australia (Queensland Section) Limited T/A Royal Flying Doctor Service Of Australia (Queensland Section) Limited [2024] FWCA 2922
Case
[2024] FWCA 2922
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the case of Royal Flying Doctor Service of Australia (Queensland Section) Limited T/A Royal Flying Doctor Service of Australia (Queensland Section) Limited, the applicant sought approval of the proposed 2024 Enterprise Agreement for mental health professionals within the organisation. The application was heard in the Fair Work Commission, which is tasked with overseeing and approving enterprise agreements under the Fair Work Act 2009. The primary concern was whether the agreement met the necessary criteria for approval, including ensuring it provided for fair and reasonable terms and conditions for the employees involved.

The central legal issues revolved around whether the agreement adequately addressed the provisions of the Fair Work Act, particularly in terms of ensuring that the agreement was not less favourable than the applicable award or safety net and that it was made in good faith and not under duress. Additionally, the court had to consider if the agreement contained the required provisions, such as those relating to pay rates, penalty rates, and other employment terms that were fair and reasonable for the mental health professionals covered by the agreement.

The Fair Work Commission examined the evidence provided by both the applicant and the respondents. It found that the agreement contained all necessary provisions and that the terms were fair and reasonable. The Commission also confirmed that the agreement was not less favourable than the relevant award or safety net and that it was made in good faith. Consequently, the Commission approved the Enterprise Agreement, recognising its compliance with the statutory requirements.

The Fair Work Commission approved the Royal Flying Doctor Service of Australia (Queensland Section) Limited Mental Health Professionals Enterprise Agreement 2024, confirming that it met all necessary legal criteria. The decision was based on the thorough examination of the agreement's terms and conditions, which were found to be fair and reasonable, and in compliance with the Fair Work Act. This approval ensures that the mental health professionals covered by the agreement will have a legally recognised framework for their employment terms.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.