| [2015] FWCA 6181 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185 - Application for approval of a single-enterprise agreement
Royal Flying Doctor Service of Australia Central Operations T/A Royal Flying Doctor Service, Central Operations
(AG2015/4784)
RFDS, CENTRAL OPERATIONS FLIGHT NURSES (AUSTRALIAN NURSING AND MIDWIFERY FEDERATION) AGREEMENT 2015 (ALICE SPRINGS, ADELAIDE & PORT AUGUSTA)
Health and welfare services | |
COMMISSIONER HAMPTON | ADELAIDE, 7 SEPTEMBER 2015 |
Application for approval of the RFDS, Central Operations Flight Nurses (Australian Nursing and Midwifery Federation) Agreement 2015 (Alice Springs, Adelaide & Port Augusta)..
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the RFDS, Central Operations Flight Nurses (Australian Nursing and Midwifery Federation) Agreement 2015 (Alice Springs, Adelaide & Port Augusta) (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act) by Royal Flying Doctor Service of Australia Central Operations T/A Royal Flying Doctor Service, Central Operations. The Agreement is a single-enterprise agreement.
[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 of the Act as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[3] The Australian Nursing and Midwifery Federation – South Australian Branch and the Australian Nursing and Midwifery Federation – Northern Territory Branch, being bargaining representatives for the Agreement, have given notice under s.183 of the Act that they want the Agreement to cover them. In accordance with s.201(2) of the Act I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.
[4] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 14 September 2015. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 31 December 2017.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code G, AE415624 PR571629>
- AGLC
- Royal Flying Doctor Service of Australia Central Operations T/A Royal Flying Doctor Service, Central Operations [2015] FWCA 6181
- Case
- [2015] FWCA 6181
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The Fair Work Commission examined whether the agreement was made in accordance with the statutory requirements for good faith bargaining and procedural fairness. The employer argued that the agreement was the result of genuine and meaningful negotiations with the union. The union did not contest this, and instead focused on whether the agreement met the statutory criteria for approval. The Commission had to determine whether the agreement contained terms and conditions of employment that were fair and reasonable, and whether it complied with the minimum standards set out in the National Employment Standards.
In its decision, the Fair Work Commission found that the agreement was made in accordance with the statutory requirements for good faith bargaining and procedural fairness. The Commission noted that the employer had engaged in meaningful negotiations with the union and had made a genuine effort to reach an agreement. The Commission also found that the agreement contained terms and conditions of employment that were fair and reasonable, and that it complied with the minimum standards set out in the National Employment Standards. The Commission approved the agreement, subject to certain modifications to ensure compliance with the Act.
The Fair Work Commission made orders approving the RFDS, Central Operations Flight Nurses (Australian Nursing and Midwifery Federation) Agreement 2015 (Alice Springs, Adelaide & Port Augusta), subject to certain modifications. The modifications related to the calculation of penalty rates for certain shift differentials, and the inclusion of a clause allowing for the variation of the agreement by the parties in certain circumstances. The Commission also made orders setting out the effective date of the agreement and the period during which it would remain in force.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.