ROWLANDS & ARDEN

The case of *Rowlands & Arden* concerned a dispute between two parties, Rowlands and Arden, heard before Small J in the Supreme Court of New South Wales. The precise nature of the dispute is not detailed in the provided text, but it involved a legal disagreement requiring judicial determination.

The central legal issue before Small J was to determine the appropriate interpretation and application of certain legal principles in the context of the dispute between Rowlands and Arden. The specific legal questions revolved around the rights and obligations of the parties as they pertained to the matter before the court.

Small J's reasoning and the legal principles applied would have been based on relevant Australian statutes and common law. The judgment would have involved an analysis of the evidence presented and the application of established legal doctrines to the facts of the case to reach a conclusion.

The final orders or outcome of the case, as determined by Small J, would have resolved the dispute between Rowlands and Arden, outlining the rights and liabilities of each party.