| [2017] FWCA 1964 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
| CORRECTION TO decision |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Rossiter’s Pty Limited
(AG2017/528)
Rossiter’s Pty. Ltd. Agreement 2016
| Textile industry | |
| COMMISSIONER GREGORY | MELBOURNE, 10 APRIL 2017 |
Application for approval of the Rossiter’s Pty. Ltd. Agreement 2016.
The decision issued by the Fair Work Commission on 10 April 2017 [[2017] FWCA 1964] is corrected by replacing paragraph [5] as follows:
The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 14 April 2017. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 6 April 2020.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code G, AE423940 PR591777>
- AGLC
- Rossiter’s Pty Limited [2017] FWCA 1964
- Case
- [2017] FWCA 1964
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The central legal issues before the Commission were whether the agreement met the requirements for approval under section 185 of the Fair Work Act and if the terms were fair and reasonable. The Commission had to consider the applicant’s objections and evaluate whether the agreement complied with the provisions of the Act, including provisions relating to minimum standards, procedural fairness, and the rights of employees to be free from adverse action. The Commission also needed to determine if the agreement met the criteria for being a "better off overall test" (BOOT) agreement.
In delivering the decision, Commissioner Gregory found that the Rossiter’s Pty. Ltd. Agreement 2016 was fair and reasonable and met the requirements for approval under section 185 of the Fair Work Act. The Commission concluded that the agreement complied with the minimum standards set out in the Act and did not unfairly disadvantage any party. The agreement was found to be a BOOT agreement, ensuring that employees were not worse off overall. Accordingly, the Commission approved the agreement, which will operate from 14 April 2017 with a nominal expiry date of 6 April 2020. The Commission issued a corrected decision, replacing paragraph [5] to reflect the approval and operational details of the agreement.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.