Roskam and Roskam
Case
•
[2018] FamCA 173
•21 March 2018
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Roskam and Roskam [2018] FamCA 173
[2018] FamCA 173
21 March 2018
CaseChat Overview and Summary
This matter before Bennett J concerned parenting orders between the mother and father of three children, C, D, and E. The dispute revolved around the arrangements for the children's living situation, time spent with the father, and communication between the parents and the children.
The court was required to determine the specific terms of parenting orders, including who would have sole parental responsibility for the children, where the children would live, the nature and extent of the father's time with the children, and the conditions under which such time would occur. Additionally, the court needed to establish the parameters for communication between the father and the children, and between the parents themselves, as well as address the costs associated with supervised contact.
Bennett J made orders discharging previous arrangements, save for specific paragraphs from a December 2016 order. The mother was granted sole parental responsibility, and the children were ordered to live with her. The father's time with the children was significantly restricted to supervised contact on specific dates throughout the year, with detailed provisions regarding the nomination of a contact service, the father's confirmation of attendance and capacity to pay, and the location of the supervised time. The father was to bear all costs of supervision. Provisions were also made for missed contact due to illness, including the requirement for a medical certificate and a make-up contact occasion. Communication between the father and mother was strictly limited, with no direct communication by email or text message. The father was also prohibited from communicating directly with the children, except for sending cards and letters, which the mother would facilitate and vet. The court reserved liberty to apply regarding supervised time and addressed the process for any applications concerning costs.
The court was required to determine the specific terms of parenting orders, including who would have sole parental responsibility for the children, where the children would live, the nature and extent of the father's time with the children, and the conditions under which such time would occur. Additionally, the court needed to establish the parameters for communication between the father and the children, and between the parents themselves, as well as address the costs associated with supervised contact.
Bennett J made orders discharging previous arrangements, save for specific paragraphs from a December 2016 order. The mother was granted sole parental responsibility, and the children were ordered to live with her. The father's time with the children was significantly restricted to supervised contact on specific dates throughout the year, with detailed provisions regarding the nomination of a contact service, the father's confirmation of attendance and capacity to pay, and the location of the supervised time. The father was to bear all costs of supervision. Provisions were also made for missed contact due to illness, including the requirement for a medical certificate and a make-up contact occasion. Communication between the father and mother was strictly limited, with no direct communication by email or text message. The father was also prohibited from communicating directly with the children, except for sending cards and letters, which the mother would facilitate and vet. The court reserved liberty to apply regarding supervised time and addressed the process for any applications concerning costs.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Family Law
Legal Concepts
-
Costs
-
Jurisdiction
-
Remedies
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Citations
Roskam and Roskam [2018] FamCA 173
Cases Citing This Decision
0
Cases Cited
0
Statutory Material Cited
6