Rosington and Rosington (No 3)

Case

[2021] FamCA 21

28 January 2021


Details
AGLC Case Decision Date
Rosington and Rosington (No 3) [2021] FamCA 21 [2021] FamCA 21 28 January 2021

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In *Rosington and Rosington (No 3)*, Stevenson J of the Family Court of Australia considered an application by the Independent Children's Lawyer (ICL) for costs. The ICL sought an order that the mother and father each pay half of their costs of the proceedings in equal shares. The father consented to paying one half of the ICL's costs, but the mother contended that the father should bear her share of these costs.

The central legal issue before the court was the appropriate allocation of the Independent Children's Lawyer's costs between the parents, specifically whether the father should be solely responsible for the mother's portion of these costs.

Stevenson J determined that the father should not bear responsibility for the whole of the costs of the Independent Children's Lawyer. The court reasoned that an equal division of the ICL's costs between the parties was not warranted in the circumstances. Consequently, the court ordered that the mother pay a sum of $12,093.50 to Legal Aid New South Wales on account of the costs of the Independent Children's Lawyer within 60 days. The father's application and the mother's response were dismissed.
Details

Areas of Law

  • Family Law

  • Civil Procedure

Legal Concepts

  • Costs

  • Jurisdiction

Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document


Cases Citing This Decision

0

Cases Cited

0

Statutory Material Cited

1