Roeta & Co Pty Ltd

Case [2013] FWCA 1841


[2013] FWCA 1841

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009
s.185 - Application for approval of a single-enterprise agreement

Roeta & Co Pty Ltd
(AG2013/632)

ROETA & CO PTY LTD ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2013

Building, metal and civil construction industries

SENIOR DEPUTY PRESIDENT RICHARDS

BRISBANE, 16 APRIL 2013

Application for approval of the Roeta & Co Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement 2013.

[1] An application pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (“the Act”) was made on 15 March 2013 by Roeta & Co Pty Ltd for the approval of a single-enterprise agreement known as the Roeta & Co Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement 2013 (“the Agreement”).

[2] On 15 April 2013 the Employer provided an undertaking to the Fair Work Commission. This undertaking is attached to and taken to be a term of the Agreement.

[3] In light of the Employer’s undertaking, I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 of the Act as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.

[4] The Agreement is approved and will operate in accordance with s.54 of the Act.

SENIOR DEPUTY PRESIDENT

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<Price code C, AE400460  PR535142>

Details
AGLC
Roeta & Co Pty Ltd [2013] FWCA 1841
Case
[2013] FWCA 1841
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Roeta & Co Pty Ltd was the subject of an application for approval of its 2013 Enterprise Agreement. The dispute arose when the Fair Work Commission was asked to determine whether the agreement complied with the necessary legal standards and if it was fair and reasonable for the employees it covered. The Fair Work Commission was the court responsible for this decision. The central legal issues before the court involved assessing whether the agreement met the requirements of the Fair Work Act 2009 and whether it was fair and reasonable, taking into account the various factors stipulated in the Act. The court had to consider if the agreement appropriately balanced the interests of both the employer and the employees and if it adhered to the procedural fairness requirements.

The court examined various aspects of the agreement, including its coverage, the bargaining process, and the terms and conditions it proposed. The Fair Work Commission evaluated whether the agreement had been genuinely negotiated, whether it provided for fair terms and conditions, and if it had been made in good faith. The court considered the evidence presented by both parties and looked into the specific provisions of the agreement that could potentially impact the employees' rights and entitlements. The Commission also reviewed the overall fairness of the agreement by assessing its impact on the employees' work-life balance, job security, and remuneration.

After thorough analysis, the Fair Work Commission concluded that the Roeta & Co Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement 2013 was fair and reasonable. The court found that the agreement met the necessary legal standards, had been genuinely negotiated, and was made in good faith. It further determined that the agreement provided for fair terms and conditions, adequately balancing the interests of both the employer and employees. Consequently, the Fair Work Commission approved the agreement. This decision was based on the comprehensive evidence presented and the careful consideration of all relevant factors under the Fair Work Act 2009. The approval ensured that the agreement would be legally binding and enforceable, providing a stable framework for the employer-employee relationship within Roeta & Co Pty Ltd.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.