Rockman & Rockman
Case
•
[2014] FCCA 1966
•29 August 2014
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Rockman & Rockman [2014] FCCA 1966
[2014] FCCA 1966
29 August 2014
CaseChat Overview and Summary
In Rockman & Rockman, the husband and wife were parties to proceedings before Judge Bender concerning the division of their property. The dispute centred on the sale of their jointly owned real property and the distribution of its proceeds, as well as the division of various shareholdings and other assets.
The court was required to determine the terms of the sale of the real property, including the proportion in which the proceeds would be divided between the husband and wife. Further issues included the wife's sole right to occupy the property pending sale, the management of the sale process, and the transfer of specific shareholdings to the wife, their daughter, and their other children. The court also needed to address the entitlement of each party to their respective superannuation and other property, the ownership of insurance policies, and the severance of any joint tenancies.
Judge Bender ordered that the real property be placed on the market for sale, with the proceeds to be applied first to sale costs and then divided 35% to the husband and 65% to the wife. The wife was granted sole occupation of the property pending sale, with responsibility for outgoings. The court also directed the transfer of specific shareholdings, with the husband transferring shares to the wife and to their daughter, and the wife transferring shares to their children Y and Z. Each party was to retain their own superannuation and other property, with insurance policies remaining the property of the named owner, and each party indemnifying the other against liabilities related to their respective entitlements. Any joint tenancies were expressly severed.
The court was required to determine the terms of the sale of the real property, including the proportion in which the proceeds would be divided between the husband and wife. Further issues included the wife's sole right to occupy the property pending sale, the management of the sale process, and the transfer of specific shareholdings to the wife, their daughter, and their other children. The court also needed to address the entitlement of each party to their respective superannuation and other property, the ownership of insurance policies, and the severance of any joint tenancies.
Judge Bender ordered that the real property be placed on the market for sale, with the proceeds to be applied first to sale costs and then divided 35% to the husband and 65% to the wife. The wife was granted sole occupation of the property pending sale, with responsibility for outgoings. The court also directed the transfer of specific shareholdings, with the husband transferring shares to the wife and to their daughter, and the wife transferring shares to their children Y and Z. Each party was to retain their own superannuation and other property, with insurance policies remaining the property of the named owner, and each party indemnifying the other against liabilities related to their respective entitlements. Any joint tenancies were expressly severed.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Family Law
-
Equity & Trusts
-
Property Law
Legal Concepts
-
Constructive Trust
-
Costs
-
Remedies
-
Fiduciary Duty
-
Injunction
-
Consent
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Citations
Rockman & Rockman [2014] FCCA 1966
Most Recent Citation
Muir and Muir [2015] FCCA 2104
Cases Citing This Decision
11
NUNN & MAYFIELD
[2019] FCCA 542
Leppin and Delorenzo
[2019] FCCA 345
SAUNDERS & SAUNDERS
[2019] FCCA 350
Cases Cited
3
Statutory Material Cited
2
Stanford v Stanford
[2012] HCA 52
Stanford v Stanford
[2012] HCA 52
Kennon & Kennon
[1997] FamCA 27