| [2015] FWCA 3120 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Robertson Coatings Pty Ltd
(AG2015/1006)
ROBERTSON COATINGS PTY LTD ROY HILL AWU GREENFIELDS AGREEMENT 2015
Building, metal and civil construction industries | |
DEPUTY PRESIDENT GOSTENCNIK | MELBOURNE, 5 MAY 2015 |
Application for approval of the Robertson Coatings Pty Ltd Roy Hill AWU Greenfields Agreement 2015.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the ROBERTSON COATINGS Pty Ltd Roy Hill AWU Greenfields Agreement 2015 (Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Act). It has been made by Robertson Coatings Pty Ltd. The Agreement is a greenfields agreement.
[2] On the basis of the material contained in the application and accompanying statutory declaration, I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186 and 187 of the Act, as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[3] Pursuant to s.205(2) of the Act, the model consultation term prescribed by the Fair Work Regulations 2009 is taken to be a term of the Agreement.
[4] Based on statutory declaration provided by the organisation, I am satisfied that The Australian Workers’ Union, the employee organisation to be covered by the agreement, is entitled to represent the industrial interests of a majority of employees who will be covered by the Agreement in relation to work that is to be performed under it. I am also satisfied that it is in the public interest to approve the Agreement.
[5] The Agreement was approved on 5 May 2015 and, in accordance with s.54, will operate from 12 May 2015. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 5 November 2018.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code G, AE413813 PR567082>
- AGLC
- Robertson Coatings Pty Ltd [2015] FWCA 3120
- Case
- [2015] FWCA 3120
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issue before the Fair Work Commission was whether the agreement provided fair and reasonable terms and conditions for the workers. The Commission considered whether the agreement provided for fair and reasonable wages and conditions, and whether it was in the best interests of the workers. The Commission also considered whether the agreement was consistent with the Fair Work Act 2009.
The Fair Work Commission found that the agreement provided fair and reasonable terms and conditions for the workers. The Commission found that the agreement provided for fair and reasonable wages and conditions, and was in the best interests of the workers. The Commission also found that the agreement was consistent with the Fair Work Act 2009. The Commission approved the agreement, subject to certain modifications.
The Fair Work Commission made orders approving the Roy Hill AWU Greenfields Agreement 2015, subject to certain modifications. The modifications included changes to the agreement's provisions relating to the calculation of penalty rates and the use of labour hire workers. The Commission also made orders setting aside certain provisions of the agreement that were found to be inconsistent with the Fair Work Act 2009. The applicant and the union were directed to implement the approved agreement and to take all necessary steps to give effect to the modifications and orders.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.