Roberts v Goodwin Street Developments Pty Ltd
Case
•
[2022] NSWCA 103
•20 June 2022
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Roberts v Goodwin Street Developments Pty Ltd [2022] NSWCA 103
[2022] NSWCA 103
20 June 2022
CaseChat Overview and Summary
In *Roberts v Goodwin Street Developments Pty Ltd*, the applicant sought a stay of execution of a judgment pending an appeal. The respondent was Goodwin Street Developments Pty Ltd. The application was heard by Gleeson JA in the Court of Appeal of New South Wales.
The primary legal issue before the Court was whether the applicant had established sufficient grounds to warrant a stay of execution. This involved determining whether there were arguable grounds of appeal and whether the applicant had provided evidence of their financial means, which is a relevant consideration in such applications.
Gleeson JA dismissed the application, finding that there were no arguable grounds of appeal. Furthermore, the applicant had failed to provide any evidence regarding their financial means, which is a necessary component for demonstrating that a stay is warranted. The Court applied the principles that govern applications for a stay pending appeal, requiring a demonstration of both arguable grounds and a compelling reason for the stay, often linked to the applicant's financial position.
Consequently, the notice of motion filed on 1 June 2022 was dismissed with costs.
The primary legal issue before the Court was whether the applicant had established sufficient grounds to warrant a stay of execution. This involved determining whether there were arguable grounds of appeal and whether the applicant had provided evidence of their financial means, which is a relevant consideration in such applications.
Gleeson JA dismissed the application, finding that there were no arguable grounds of appeal. Furthermore, the applicant had failed to provide any evidence regarding their financial means, which is a necessary component for demonstrating that a stay is warranted. The Court applied the principles that govern applications for a stay pending appeal, requiring a demonstration of both arguable grounds and a compelling reason for the stay, often linked to the applicant's financial position.
Consequently, the notice of motion filed on 1 June 2022 was dismissed with costs.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Civil Procedure
Legal Concepts
-
Appeal
-
Costs
-
Stay of Proceedings
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Most Recent Citation
Stekovic v Radovanovic (No 2) [2023] NSWSC 1602
Cases Citing This Decision
2
Nyangbul v State of New South Wales
[2025] NSWCA 119
Stekovic v Radovanovic (No 2)
[2023] NSWSC 1602
Cases Cited
5
Statutory Material Cited
1
Adeels Palace Pty Ltd v Moubarak
[2009] NSWCA 130
Kalifair Pty Ltd v Digi-Tech (Australia) Ltd
[2002] NSWCA 383
Kalifair Pty Ltd v Digi-Tech (Australia) Ltd
[2002] NSWCA 383