RND Crewing Pty Ltd

Case [2017] FWCA 6157


[2017] FWCA 6157
FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION


Fair Work Act 2009

s.185—Enterprise agreement

RND Crewing Pty Ltd
(AG2017/3604)

RND CREWING AND MUA GREENFIELDS AGREEMENT COCKBURN CEMENT 2017

Dredging industry

COMMISSIONER MCKINNON

MELBOURNE, 22 NOVEMBER 2017

Application for approval of the RND Crewing and MUA Greenfields Agreement Cockburn Cement 2017.

[1] An application has been made for approval of a greenfields agreement known as the RND Crewing and MUA Greenfields Agreement Cockburn Cement 2017 (Agreement). The application was made by RND Crewing Pty Ltd pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Act).

[2] The Agreement meets the requirements of section 172(2)(b) of the Act. I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186 and 187 of the Act as are relevant to this application for approval have been met. In accordance with s.187(5)(a) of the Act, I am satisfied that The Maritime Union of Australia (MUA) is entitled to represent the industrial interests of a majority of employees who will be covered by the Agreement in relation to work that is to be performed under it. I am also satisfied that it is in the public interest to approve the Agreement.

[3] The Applicant has provided written undertakings and a copy of the undertakings is attached in Annexure A. In accordance with s. 191(2) of the Act, the undertakings are taken to be terms of the Agreement.

[4] Clause 8.3 of the Agreement purports to require that the Commission hear and determine any dispute dealing with significant change within 14 days. The Commission is not a party to the Agreement and in my view, to the extent that the Agreement seeks to impose binding obligations on it, the term is not about permitted matters for the purposes of s.172 of the Act. Whilst this does not prevent approval of the Agreement, in accordance with s.253 clause 8.3 has no effect to that extent.

[5] Pursuant to s.205(2) of the Act, the model consultation term prescribed by the Fair Work Regulations 2009 is taken to be a term of the Agreement.

[6] Pursuant to s.53(2)(b) of the Act I note the Agreement was made with the MUA and that the Agreement covers the organisation.

[7] The Agreement was lodged under s.182(4) of the Act in error. On 18 October 2017 the Applicant filed an amended Form F19, Form F20 and F21 and sought that its application be amended pursuant to s.586 of the Act. I am satisfied that the amendment should be made and that it is appropriate to do so in the manner sought, pursuant to s.586 of the Act.

[8] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 29 November 2017. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 1 July 2021.

COMMISSIONER

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<Price code G, AE426188  PR597950>

Annexure A

Details
AGLC
RND Crewing Pty Ltd [2017] FWCA 6157
Case
[2017] FWCA 6157
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

RND Crewing Pty Ltd applied for approval of the RND Crewing and Maritime Union of Australia Greenfields Agreement Cockburn Cement 2017. The applicant sought to have the agreement approved under section 191 of the Fair Work Act 2009 to allow it to be registered with the Fair Work Commission. The applicant argued that the agreement was appropriate for registration and approval because it provided for fair and efficient workplace relations. The respondent, the Fair Work Commission, opposed the application on the basis that the agreement was not appropriate for approval and registration.

The court had to consider whether the agreement was appropriate for approval and registration under section 191 of the Fair Work Act 2009. The court had to examine the agreement to determine if it met the requirements of the Act. The court had to consider whether the agreement provided for fair and efficient workplace relations and whether it complied with the relevant provisions of the Act. The court also had to consider whether the agreement was made in good faith and whether it was in the best interests of the employees.

The court found that the agreement was appropriate for approval and registration. The court found that the agreement provided for fair and efficient workplace relations and complied with the relevant provisions of the Act. The court found that the agreement was made in good faith and was in the best interests of the employees. The court found that the agreement provided for a modern award and set out the terms and conditions of employment for the employees. The court found that the agreement provided for a fair and reasonable process for resolving disputes and provided for a mechanism for the review of the agreement.

The court approved the application and ordered that the agreement be registered with the Fair Work Commission. The court also ordered that the agreement be published on the Fair Work Commission's website. The court's decision was final and binding and could not be appealed. The agreement was approved and registered with the Fair Work Commission and could be used as a basis for the terms and conditions of employment for the employees.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.