Riley and Riley

Case

[2010] FamCA 65

2 February 2010


Details
AGLC Case Decision Date
Riley and Riley [2010] FamCA 65 [2010] FamCA 65 2 February 2010

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the Family Court of Australia, Mushin J considered applications by the father concerning the production of documents and the attendance of witnesses in proceedings involving children K and T. The father sought to file and serve subpoenas for specific documents and for witnesses to give evidence.

The primary legal issues before the court were whether to grant the father leave to file and serve a subpoena for certain health records, and whether to dismiss his applications for other subpoenas, while also considering the possibility of future applications for witness evidence.

Mushin J granted the father leave to file and serve a subpoena directed to the District Manager of Townsville Health Services Clinical Information Services for documents pertaining to children K and T. However, the father's applications for other subpoenas were dismissed. Notwithstanding this dismissal, the father was granted leave to renew any application for a subpoena requiring a witness to give evidence at such time as the trial date was determined. The matter was otherwise referred to the Registrar for further directions regarding trial preparation, with costs reserved and general liberty to apply.
Details

Areas of Law

  • Family Law

  • Civil Procedure

  • Evidence

Legal Concepts

  • Discovery

  • Costs

  • Jurisdiction

  • Procedural Fairness

Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document


Cases Citing This Decision

0

Cases Cited

0

Statutory Material Cited

0