RIGG&STILLWELL
Case
•
[2015] FCCA 2501
•16 July 2015
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Rigg and Stillwell [2015] FCCA 2501
[2015] FCCA 2501
16 July 2015
CaseChat Overview and Summary
This matter came before Judge Harman concerning parenting arrangements for a child, X. The specific dispute involved the father's application for orders regarding the child's time with him and related procedural matters.
The court was required to determine several issues, including the allocation of time between the child and her father, the authorisation of individuals to collect the child, and provisions for daily telephone contact between the child and each parent. Additionally, the court considered the role of the Independent Children's Lawyer, the ability of parties to issue subpoenas, and the photocopying of subpoenaed material.
Judge Harman made orders vacating existing trial dates and relisting the matter for a hearing commencing on 28 September 2015. The court varied existing orders to provide for specific periods of time the child would spend with her father each week, including collection from pre-school and return. Provisions were also made for additional time with the father during a specific weekend and for daily telephone contact between the child and each parent, with conditions to ensure privacy and availability. The court also granted leave for the Independent Children's Lawyer to provide a psychologist with a copy of a report and for parties and the Independent Children's Lawyer to issue further subpoenas. Specific terms were imposed on the photocopying of subpoenaed material, including limitations on further copying and the return of copies for destruction at the conclusion of proceedings.
The court was required to determine several issues, including the allocation of time between the child and her father, the authorisation of individuals to collect the child, and provisions for daily telephone contact between the child and each parent. Additionally, the court considered the role of the Independent Children's Lawyer, the ability of parties to issue subpoenas, and the photocopying of subpoenaed material.
Judge Harman made orders vacating existing trial dates and relisting the matter for a hearing commencing on 28 September 2015. The court varied existing orders to provide for specific periods of time the child would spend with her father each week, including collection from pre-school and return. Provisions were also made for additional time with the father during a specific weekend and for daily telephone contact between the child and each parent, with conditions to ensure privacy and availability. The court also granted leave for the Independent Children's Lawyer to provide a psychologist with a copy of a report and for parties and the Independent Children's Lawyer to issue further subpoenas. Specific terms were imposed on the photocopying of subpoenaed material, including limitations on further copying and the return of copies for destruction at the conclusion of proceedings.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Family Law
-
Civil Procedure
Legal Concepts
-
Appeal
-
Costs
-
Discovery
-
Jurisdiction
-
Procedural Fairness
-
Remedies
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Citations
Rigg and Stillwell [2015] FCCA 2501
Cases Citing This Decision
0
Cases Cited
9
Statutory Material Cited
8
Taylor & Barker
[2007] FamCA 1246
Dennis v Australian Broadcasting Corporation
[2008] NSWCA 37
Queensland v JL holdings Pty Ltd
[1997] HCA 1