Rigg and Stilwell (No.4)
Case
•
[2016] FCCA 2205
•26 August 2016
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Rigg and Stilwell (No.4) [2016] FCCA 2205
[2016] FCCA 2205
26 August 2016
CaseChat Overview and Summary
In the matter of *Rigg and Stilwell (No.4)*, Judge Harman considered parenting orders concerning the child, X. The dispute involved the parents, Ms Stilwell and Mr Rigg, and their respective roles and responsibilities in relation to X.
The court was required to determine the specific parenting arrangements for X, including where X would live, the time X would spend with each parent, and the nature of their shared parental responsibility. The court also needed to address provisions for communication between the parents regarding X's health, education, and psychological well-being, as well as the parents' participation in a Parenting Orders Program.
Judge Harman ordered that all prior parenting orders be discharged. The court established that both parents would have parental responsibility for X, with X to live with Ms Stilwell. Specific time arrangements were detailed for X to spend with Mr Rigg during school terms and holidays, including provisions for alternate weekends, intervening weeks, and school holidays, with particular arrangements for Christmas Eve and Boxing Day. The orders also mandated that both parents ensure they are listed as parents and emergency contacts at X's school, facilitate direct communication regarding X's health and treatment decisions, and obtain consent before X attends counselling or psychological services. Furthermore, both parents were ordered to re-engage with the Parenting Orders Program.
The court was required to determine the specific parenting arrangements for X, including where X would live, the time X would spend with each parent, and the nature of their shared parental responsibility. The court also needed to address provisions for communication between the parents regarding X's health, education, and psychological well-being, as well as the parents' participation in a Parenting Orders Program.
Judge Harman ordered that all prior parenting orders be discharged. The court established that both parents would have parental responsibility for X, with X to live with Ms Stilwell. Specific time arrangements were detailed for X to spend with Mr Rigg during school terms and holidays, including provisions for alternate weekends, intervening weeks, and school holidays, with particular arrangements for Christmas Eve and Boxing Day. The orders also mandated that both parents ensure they are listed as parents and emergency contacts at X's school, facilitate direct communication regarding X's health and treatment decisions, and obtain consent before X attends counselling or psychological services. Furthermore, both parents were ordered to re-engage with the Parenting Orders Program.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Family Law
Legal Concepts
-
Consent
-
Remedies
-
Appeal
-
Costs
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Cases Citing This Decision
0
Cases Cited
1
Statutory Material Cited
4
Knight v Maclean
[2002] NSWCA 314
Knight v Maclean
[2002] NSWCA 314