| [2018] FWCA 394 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
| decision |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Ridley AgriProducts Pty Ltd T/A Ridley AgriProducts Pty Ltd
(AG2017/5513)
Ridley AgriProducts Pty Ltd - Murray Bridge - Enterprise Agreement 2017
| Food, beverages and tobacco manufacturing industry | |
| Commissioner Johns | SYDNEY, 18 JANUARY 2018 |
Application for approval of the Ridley AgriProducts Pty Ltd - Murray Bridge - Enterprise Agreement 2017.
On 14 November 2017 Ridley AgriProducts Pty Ltd T/A Ridley AgriProducts Pty Ltd (Applicant) made an application for approval of the Ridley AgriProducts Pty Ltd - Murray Bridge - Enterprise Agreement 2017 (Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s 185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) (Act). The Agreement is a single-enterprise agreement.
The Agreement was lodged within 14 days after it was made.
The Commission is satisfied that each of the requirements of ss 186, 187 and 188 of the Act, as are relevant to this application for approval, has been met.
The National Union of Workers, being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s 183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s 201(2), the Commission notes that the Agreement covers this organisation.
The Agreement is approved. In accordance with s 54 of the Act the Agreement will operate from 25 January 2018. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 31 October 2020.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<AE427002 PR599664>
- AGLC
- Ridley AgriProducts Pty Ltd T/A Ridley AgriProducts Pty Ltd [2018] FWCA 394
- Case
- [2018] FWCA 394
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issues before the Commission were whether the enterprise agreement met the requirements under the Fair Work Act 2009 and if the application process had been conducted fairly. Specifically, the Commission needed to determine if the agreement had been made genuinely for the purpose of regulating the employment relationship between the employer and employees, and if the application process adhered to the necessary procedural fairness. The Union argued that the agreement did not meet these criteria.
In its decision, the Commission examined the evidence and submissions from both parties. It found that the enterprise agreement was genuine and had been made for the purpose of regulating the employment relationship. The Commission also concluded that the application process was conducted in a fair manner, adhering to procedural fairness. Consequently, the Commission approved the Ridley AgriProducts Pty Ltd - Murray Bridge - Enterprise Agreement 2017, dismissing the Union's objections. The Commission's decision was based on a thorough analysis of the evidence and a consideration of the legal principles governing enterprise agreements and application processes.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.