Rickett and Gull
Case
•
[2009] FamCA 805
•10 August 2009
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Rickett and Gull [2009] FamCA 805
[2009] FamCA 805
10 August 2009
CaseChat Overview and Summary
In the Family Court of Australia, Justice Murphy presided over proceedings involving Rickett and Gull concerning a parenting application. The dispute centred on arrangements for the child born in December 2004.
The court was required to determine interim parenting orders regarding the child's living arrangements and time spent with each parent. Additionally, the court needed to address the process for assessing the child's and parents' issues, including the role of a Family Consultant, and to set a date for a further hearing of the parenting application. The court also considered the property application, adjourning it for a future mention.
Justice Murphy made orders for the child to live with the mother and for the father to spend time with the child on a specified roster, including an extended period. The father was released from a previous undertaking regarding supervision of his time with the child. The court also ordered both parents to facilitate telephone communication with the child on nights when the child was not with them. Furthermore, the court mandated attendance at an Intake Event for the Child Responsive Program and all future appointments with a Family Consultant, who was empowered to provide an assessment to the parties and the court. The court also included a Fact Sheet detailing the obligations and consequences of contravening the orders. The costs of both parties were reserved, and the property application was adjourned.
The court was required to determine interim parenting orders regarding the child's living arrangements and time spent with each parent. Additionally, the court needed to address the process for assessing the child's and parents' issues, including the role of a Family Consultant, and to set a date for a further hearing of the parenting application. The court also considered the property application, adjourning it for a future mention.
Justice Murphy made orders for the child to live with the mother and for the father to spend time with the child on a specified roster, including an extended period. The father was released from a previous undertaking regarding supervision of his time with the child. The court also ordered both parents to facilitate telephone communication with the child on nights when the child was not with them. Furthermore, the court mandated attendance at an Intake Event for the Child Responsive Program and all future appointments with a Family Consultant, who was empowered to provide an assessment to the parties and the court. The court also included a Fact Sheet detailing the obligations and consequences of contravening the orders. The costs of both parties were reserved, and the property application was adjourned.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Family Law
Legal Concepts
-
Costs
-
Jurisdiction
-
Procedural Fairness
-
Remedies
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Citations
Rickett and Gull [2009] FamCA 805
Cases Citing This Decision
0
Cases Cited
2
Statutory Material Cited
1
Dicosta & Dicosta
[2008] FamCAFC 161
Goode & Goode
[2006] FamCA 1346