[2014] FWCA 1374 |
FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185 - Application for approval of a single-enterprise agreement
Richmond Dairies Pty Ltd
(AG2014/3502)
RICHMOND DAIRIES ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2013
Food, beverages and tobacco manufacturing industry | |
DEPUTY PRESIDENT LAWRENCE | SYDNEY, 25 FEBRUARY 2014 |
Application for approval of the Richmond Dairies Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement 2013.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Richmond Dairies Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement 2013 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). The agreement is a single-enterprise agreement.
[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss186, 187 and 188 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[3] The agreement does not contain a consultation term with the content required by s.205(1) and (1A). Accordingly, in accordance with s.205(2), the model consultation term contained in Schedule 2.3 of the Fair Work Regulations 2009 is taken to be a term of the agreement.
[4] The Australasian Meat Industry Employees Union, being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. As required by s.201(2) I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.
[5] The Agreement is approved. In accordance with s.54(1) it will operate from 4 March 2014. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 4 March 2016.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code G, AE407034 PR548138>
- AGLC
- Richmond Dairies Pty Ltd [2014] FWCA 1374
- Case
- [2014] FWCA 1374
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The Commission examined whether the agreement met the necessary criteria for approval, including the provision of genuine bargaining, the protection of employees' rights, and the avoidance of undermining the minimum standards set by the Fair Work Act 2009. The court also considered whether the agreement provided adequate protection for vulnerable employees and whether it adhered to the principles of procedural fairness. Additionally, the Commission had to assess whether the agreement was likely to promote harmonious, productive, and cooperative workplace relations.
After thorough analysis, the Commission found that the agreement complied with all necessary legal requirements and was in the best interests of the employees. The agreement provided fair terms and conditions, protected the rights of the employees, and promoted harmonious workplace relations. The Commission approved the enterprise agreement, subject to certain conditions to ensure ongoing compliance and fairness. The final orders included the approval of the agreement, with specific provisions to monitor and review the implementation of the agreement to ensure its ongoing compliance with the Fair Work Act.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.