Richards v Tanner

In Richards v Tanner, the parties were a former couple who had entered into an oral agreement for the loan of a sum of money. The respondent claimed that the loan had been received without the intention of repayment. The matter was brought before the court, which was required to determine whether the respondent's claim was valid and whether the adjudicator's finding that the loan was intended to be repaid was correct. The court was also required to determine whether the finding was an error of fact or law. The court found that the adjudicator's finding was supported by the evidence and that there was no error of fact or law in the decision. The court concluded that the appellant was to repay the loan to the respondent as ordered by the adjudicator. The court refused the appellant leave to appeal the decision.