RICHARD ALBARRAN, BRENT KIJURINA AND CAMERON SHAW AS JOINT AND SEVERAL ADMINISTRATORS OF COOPER & OXLEY BUILDERS PTY LTD (ADMINISTRATORS APPOINTED)
Case
•
[2018] WASC 161
•29 MAY 2018
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
RICHARD ALBARRAN, BRENT KIJURINA AND CAMERON SHAW AS JOINT AND SEVERAL ADMINISTRATORS OF COOPER & OXLEY BUILDERS PTY LTD (ADMINISTRATORS APPOINTED) [2018] WASC 161
[2018] WASC 161
29 MAY 2018
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The case involved the administrators of Cooper & Oxley Builders Pty Ltd, who sought approval for a non-inclusion of a priority provision in a deed of company arrangement. The administrators applied to the Federal Circuit Court of Australia for approval of the deed, which proposed to exclude certain eligible employee creditors from the priority provisions of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth). The employees objected to the application, arguing that the proposed deed was unfair and did not provide for their entitlements.
The legal issues before the court included whether the proposed deed was fair and equitable, and whether the non-inclusion of the priority provision for eligible employee creditors was justified. The court also needed to determine whether the administrators had acted in accordance with their duties under the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) in seeking approval of the deed.
The court found that the proposed deed was fair and equitable and that the non-inclusion of the priority provision for eligible employee creditors was justified. The court noted that the administrators had acted in accordance with their duties under the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) and that the proposed deed provided for the fair and efficient resolution of the company's debts. The court also found that the employees' objections were not well-founded and that the proposed deed provided for their entitlements in a fair and reasonable manner.
The court approved the non-inclusion of the priority provision for eligible employee creditors in the deed of company arrangement. The court noted that the proposed deed provided for the fair and efficient resolution of the company's debts and that the administrators had acted in accordance with their duties under the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth). The court also noted that the employees' objections were not well-founded and that the proposed deed provided for their entitlements in a fair and reasonable manner.
The legal issues before the court included whether the proposed deed was fair and equitable, and whether the non-inclusion of the priority provision for eligible employee creditors was justified. The court also needed to determine whether the administrators had acted in accordance with their duties under the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) in seeking approval of the deed.
The court found that the proposed deed was fair and equitable and that the non-inclusion of the priority provision for eligible employee creditors was justified. The court noted that the administrators had acted in accordance with their duties under the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) and that the proposed deed provided for the fair and efficient resolution of the company's debts. The court also found that the employees' objections were not well-founded and that the proposed deed provided for their entitlements in a fair and reasonable manner.
The court approved the non-inclusion of the priority provision for eligible employee creditors in the deed of company arrangement. The court noted that the proposed deed provided for the fair and efficient resolution of the company's debts and that the administrators had acted in accordance with their duties under the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth). The court also noted that the employees' objections were not well-founded and that the proposed deed provided for their entitlements in a fair and reasonable manner.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Insolvency Law
Legal Concepts
-
Voluntary Administration
-
Deed of Company Arrangement
-
Priority Provision
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Most Recent Citation
Re Wiluna Mining Corporation Ltd [2023] WASC 194
Cases Citing This Decision
8
In the matter of South Head & District Synagogue (Sydney) (in liq) (controllers appointed)
[2019] NSWSC 1522
Re Wiluna Mining Corporation Ltd
[2023] WASC 194
Re Pilot Advisory Pty Ltd
[2019] FCA 2171
Cases Cited
7
Statutory Material Cited
1
Re Simpkiss Pty Ltd (in liq)
[2018] FCA 2121