Reynolds and Walls
Case
•
[2018] FamCA 905
•7 November 2018
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Reynolds and Walls [2018] FamCA 905
[2018] FamCA 905
7 November 2018
CaseChat Overview and Summary
In the matter of *Reynolds and Walls*, heard before Tree J, the dispute concerned parenting orders for a child born in 2008. The orders addressed the child's living arrangements, parental responsibility, and communication between the parents.
The court was required to determine the specific terms of parenting orders, including where the child would live, the allocation of parental responsibility, and the nature and extent of communication and contact between the parents and the child. The court also considered the role of an Independent Children's Lawyer and the dismissal of extant applications.
Tree J ordered that the child live with the Mother and that the Mother have sole parental responsibility. However, the Mother was directed to keep the Father informed about the child's education, extra-curricular activities, health, and any changes to living arrangements, with specific communication protocols outlined. The Father was permitted to send gifts and letters on certain occasions, with restrictions on the content of any written messages. The Mother was to facilitate communication if the child wished to contact the Father, and both parents were ordered to communicate via a specified app and refrain from denigrating each other. The Independent Children's Lawyer was to be discharged upon the expiry of the appeal period or determination of any appeal, and all other applications were dismissed.
The court was required to determine the specific terms of parenting orders, including where the child would live, the allocation of parental responsibility, and the nature and extent of communication and contact between the parents and the child. The court also considered the role of an Independent Children's Lawyer and the dismissal of extant applications.
Tree J ordered that the child live with the Mother and that the Mother have sole parental responsibility. However, the Mother was directed to keep the Father informed about the child's education, extra-curricular activities, health, and any changes to living arrangements, with specific communication protocols outlined. The Father was permitted to send gifts and letters on certain occasions, with restrictions on the content of any written messages. The Mother was to facilitate communication if the child wished to contact the Father, and both parents were ordered to communicate via a specified app and refrain from denigrating each other. The Independent Children's Lawyer was to be discharged upon the expiry of the appeal period or determination of any appeal, and all other applications were dismissed.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Family Law
Legal Concepts
-
Appeal
-
Costs
-
Damages
-
Injunction
-
Remedies
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Citations
Reynolds and Walls [2018] FamCA 905
Cases Citing This Decision
0
Cases Cited
8
Statutory Material Cited
2
Banks & Banks
[2015] FamCAFC 36
Wacal Developments Pty Ltd v Realty Developments Pty Ltd
[1978] HCA 30
S v Australian Crime Commission
[2005] FCA 1310