Reuters and Reuters (No. 2)

In the matter of Reuters and Reuters (No. 2), the proceedings involved a dispute between a husband and wife, heard by Young J. The specific nature of the dispute is not detailed, but the orders indicate it concerns property division and financial matters within a family law context.

The court was required to determine the appropriate orders for case management, property valuation, and the production of financial documents. Key issues included the valuation of specific properties and mobile equipment, the disclosure of mortgage and bank statements related to those properties, and the stay of certain prior ex parte orders. The court also addressed the costs of the proceedings.

Young J ordered that all extant applications be referred to the Registrar for case management and listing for hearing. The husband was directed to obtain, at his expense, current market valuations for specified properties and mobile equipment within sixty days, and to serve these valuations and supporting affidavits on the wife's solicitors. The husband was also ordered to provide the wife's solicitors with all relevant mortgage and bank statements and related documents evidencing any loans encumbering the properties. Furthermore, paragraphs 2, 4, 5, and 6 of previous ex parte orders were stayed until further order. The husband was ordered to pay the wife $1,322 for costs fixed at a previous hearing, with the costs of the current hearing reserved to the trial judge.