[2016] FWCA 10
DECISION
| Fair Work Act 2009 | |
| s.185—Enterprise agreement | |
| Retaining Wall Solutions Pty Ltd t/a Retaining Wall Solutions | |
| (AG2015/7551) | |
| RW SOLUTIONS ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2015 | |
| Building, metal and civil construction industries | |
| COMMISSIONER GREGORY | MELBOURNE, 5 JANUARY 2016 |
Application for approval of the RW Solutions Enterprise Agreement 2015.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the
RW Solutions Enterprise Agreement 2015 (the Agreement). The application was made
pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Retaining Wall
Solutions Pty Ltd t/a Retaining Wall Solutions. The Agreement is a single enterprise
agreement.
[2] The Applicant has provided written undertakings. A copy of the undertakings is
attached in Annexure A. I am satisfied that the undertakings will not cause financial detriment
to any employee covered by the Agreement and that the undertakings will not result in
substantial changes to the Agreement.
[3] Subject to the undertakings referred to above, I am satisfied that each of the
requirements of ss.186, 187, 188 and 190 as are relevant to this application for approval have
been met.
[4] In accordance with the terms of Clause 10 of the Agreement, which incorporates the
model flexibility term, the model term is taken to be a term of the agreement.
[2016] FWCA 10
[5] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from
12 January 2016. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 4 January 2020.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code C, AE417309 PR575643>
[2016] FWCA 10
Annexure A
- AGLC
- Retaining Wall Solutions Pty Ltd [2016] FWCA 10
- Case
- [2016] FWCA 10
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court had to ascertain if the agreement fulfilled the criteria outlined in sections 186, 187, 188, and 190 of the Act. Additionally, the court examined the written undertakings provided by the applicant to ensure they would not cause financial harm to the employees and would not lead to significant alterations in the agreement. The court also considered the model flexibility term incorporated in Clause 10 of the Agreement.
After evaluating the application and the provided undertakings, the Commissioner concluded that all the necessary requirements for approval were met. The Commissioner was satisfied that the agreement would not result in financial detriment to employees and would not lead to substantial changes. Consequently, the court approved the agreement and determined that it would commence on 12 January 2016. The nominal expiry date for the agreement was set at 4 January 2020.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.