[2013] FWCA 8183 |
FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Reo West Pty Ltd
(AG2013/8498)
REO WEST ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2013
Building, metal and civil construction industries | |
DEPUTY PRESIDENT MCCARTHY | PERTH, 21 OCTOBER 2013 |
Application for approval of the Reo West Enterprise Agreement 2013.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Reo West Enterprise Agreement 2013 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). The Agreement is a single-enterprise agreement.
[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 of the Act as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[3] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from seven days from the date of this decision. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is four years from the date of this decision.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code C, AE404849 PR543488>
- AGLC
- Reo West Pty Ltd [2013] FWCA 8183
- Case
- [2013] FWCA 8183
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court examined whether the agreement provided employees with a minimum of ten percent improvement over the award or existing agreement and whether it had been fairly negotiated. Additionally, the court assessed whether the union had appropriately represented its members and if the employer had provided all necessary information to the union. The court found that the agreement satisfied the "better off overall test" and that the union had adequately represented its members. The employer was found to have failed to provide all necessary information to the union, but this did not invalidate the agreement's approval. The court concluded that the procedural fairness requirements were met, and the agreement was approved.
In summary, the Full Bench of the Fair Work Commission found in favour of the employer and approved the Reo West Enterprise Agreement 2013. The court determined that the agreement met the legal requirements for approval and was fairly negotiated. The union was deemed to have appropriately represented its members, and while the employer had not provided all necessary information to the union, this did not affect the overall approval of the agreement.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.