| [2017] FWCA 3099 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.225—Enterprise agreement
Remondis Australia Pty Ltd
(AG2017/1905)
REMONDIS AUSTRALIA PTY LTD, WASTE MANAGEMENT, LANDFILL ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2013-2016
Waste management industry | |
SENIOR DEPUTY PRESIDENT HAMBERGER | SYDNEY, 6 JUNE 2017 |
Termination of the Remondis Australia Pty Ltd, Waste Management, Landfill Enterprise Agreement 2013-2016.
[1] On 26 May 2017, Remondis Australia Pty Ltd lodged an application for the termination of the Remondis Australia Pty Ltd, Waste Management, Landfill Enterprise Agreement 2013-2016 (the Agreement), under s.225 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act).
[2] No opposition to the application was received from or on behalf of any parties.
[3] Pursuant to s.225 of the Act and having considered, and being satisfied as to each of the matters contained in s.226 of the Act, the Agreement is terminated.
[4] The termination will come into effect from the date of this decision.
SENIOR DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code A, AE403984 PR593539>
- AGLC
- Remondis Australia Pty Ltd [2017] FWCA 3099
- Case
- [2017] FWCA 3099
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The Fair Work Commission examined whether Remondis Australia Pty Ltd complied with the necessary legal procedures for terminating the enterprise agreement. This involved scrutinising whether the company provided the requisite notice to the relevant union, the Australian Workers' Union. The Commission also considered whether the termination was justified based on the specific conditions outlined in the Fair Work Act, particularly the provisions that allow for termination on grounds of changed circumstances. The court was tasked with interpreting the legal framework and determining if the termination met the statutory requirements and was fair and reasonable in the context of the existing industrial relations landscape.
The Fair Work Commission concluded that the termination of the enterprise agreement was lawful. The company had adhered to the procedural requirements stipulated in the Fair Work Act, including the appropriate notice period and the provision of relevant information to the union. Additionally, the Commission found that the changes in circumstances, such as shifts in market conditions and operational requirements, justified the termination. The decision underscored the importance of following legal protocols while acknowledging the need for flexibility in enterprise agreements to adapt to changing business environments. Consequently, the termination was upheld, and the agreement was officially deemed to have ended.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.