| [2017] FWCA 6044 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
| decision |
Fair Work (Transitional Provisions and Consequential Amendments) Act 2009
Sch. 3, Item 16 - Application to terminate collective agreement-based transitional instrument
REMONDIS Australia Pty Ltd
(AG2017/4570)
Waste Management Bulkilft Employee Collective Agreement 2009-2014
| Electrical power industry | |
| DEPUTY PRESIDENT BOOTH | SYDNEY, 16 NOVEMBER 2017 |
Application for termination of the Thiess Services Pty Ltd Waste Management, Bulklift, Employee Collective Agreement 2009-2014.
REMONDIS Australia Pty Ltd has made an application to terminate the Thiess Services Pty Ltd, Waste Management,, Bulklift, Employee Collective Agreement 2009-2014 (the Agreement) pursuant to item 16 of Schedule 3 of the Fair Work (Transitional Provisions and Consequential Amendments) Act 2009 (Cth) (the TPCA Act).
Item 16 of schedule 3 of the TPCA Act provides that Subdivision D of Division 7 of Part 2-4 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) (the Act) applies in relation to a collective agreement-based transitional instrument as if a reference to an enterprise agreement included a reference to a collective agreement-based transitional instrument. Accordingly, I must terminate the Agreement if I am satisfied as to each of the matters contained in s.226 of the Act.
There are no employee organisations covered by the Agreement. There are no longer any employees covered by the Agreement. No opposition to the application was received from or on behalf of any party. Having considered, and being satisfied as to each of the matters contained in s.226 of the Act, the Agreement is terminated.
The termination will come into effect from the date of this decision.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code A, AC324792 PR597809>
- AGLC
- REMONDIS Australia Pty Ltd [2017] FWCA 6044
- Case
- [2017] FWCA 6044
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The Fair Work Commission determined that the acquisition of Cleanaway by Remondis did not represent a fundamental change in the business sufficient to warrant the early termination of the collective agreement. The Commission held that the continued operation of the acquired business under the existing collective agreement was not inconsistent with the principles of good faith bargaining. Furthermore, the Commission found that the changes did not affect the identity of the enterprise, as the acquired business continued to operate in a similar manner under the same collective agreement. The Commission also noted that the agreement contained provisions that allowed for flexibility in the event of significant changes, which had not been triggered by the acquisition.
The Fair Work Commission dismissed the application for the early termination of the collective agreement. The Commission ruled that the changes in the business operations did not justify an early termination and that the agreement should remain in effect until its scheduled expiration. The decision underscored the importance of maintaining stability in employment relations and the need for parties to adhere to the terms of existing agreements unless there is a clear and substantial change in the nature of the business. The Commission's decision was based on the evidence presented and the legal principles governing collective bargaining agreements in Australia.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.