Reliance Financial Services Pty Ltd v Allyma Express Holdings Pty Ltd
Case
•
[2018] NSWSC 1163
•26 July 2018
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Reliance Financial Services Pty Ltd v Allyma Express Holdings Pty Ltd [2018] NSWSC 1163
[2018] NSWSC 1163
26 July 2018
CaseChat Overview and Summary
Reliance Financial Services sought leave to rely on affidavits and a commercial list response that had been filed outside the allowed time and on the day before the hearing. The defendants, Allyma Express Holdings, opposed the application on the grounds of extreme prejudice. The court was required to determine whether the plaintiff was entitled to leave to file documents late and whether such leave should be granted given the prejudice to the defendants.
The court held that the late filing of the documents would result in extreme prejudice to the defendants, as they would not have sufficient time to prepare a proper response. The court noted that the defendants had already incurred significant costs in responding to the initial application, and allowing the late filings would further increase these costs. The court found that the plaintiff's reasons for the late filings were not compelling and that the prejudice to the defendants outweighed any potential benefit to the plaintiff. The court therefore refused the application for leave to file the documents out of time.
The court found that the loan agreements between the parties granted security interests over all the property of the relevant defendants. The court held that the defendants had breached the terms of the loan agreements and that the plaintiff was entitled to an order for delivery up of the specified property interests. The court did not grant leave for the plaintiff to file affidavits and a commercial list response out of time due to the extreme prejudice it would cause to the defendants. The court did, however, grant the plaintiff's application for an order for delivery up of the specified property interests.
The court held that the late filing of the documents would result in extreme prejudice to the defendants, as they would not have sufficient time to prepare a proper response. The court noted that the defendants had already incurred significant costs in responding to the initial application, and allowing the late filings would further increase these costs. The court found that the plaintiff's reasons for the late filings were not compelling and that the prejudice to the defendants outweighed any potential benefit to the plaintiff. The court therefore refused the application for leave to file the documents out of time.
The court found that the loan agreements between the parties granted security interests over all the property of the relevant defendants. The court held that the defendants had breached the terms of the loan agreements and that the plaintiff was entitled to an order for delivery up of the specified property interests. The court did not grant leave for the plaintiff to file affidavits and a commercial list response out of time due to the extreme prejudice it would cause to the defendants. The court did, however, grant the plaintiff's application for an order for delivery up of the specified property interests.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Civil Litigation & Procedure
-
Property Law
Legal Concepts
-
Jurisdiction
-
Limitation Periods
-
Specific Performance
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Most Recent Citation
Reliance Financial Services Pty Ltd v Allyma Express Holdings Pty Ltd (No 2) [2018] NSWSC 1776
Cases Citing This Decision
2
Cases Cited
0
Statutory Material Cited
1