[2016] FWCA 418
DECISION
| Fair Work Act 2009 |
| s.185 - Application for approval of a single-enterprise agreement |
| Reino International Pty Ltd T/A Duncan Solutions Australia |
| (AG2015/7845) |
REINO INTERNATIONAL PTY LTD (TRADING AS DUNCAN
SOLUTIONS AUSTRALIA) ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2015
Local government administration
| DEPUTY PRESIDENT LAWRENCE | SYDNEY, 21 JANUARY 2016 |
Application for approval of the Reino International Pty Ltd (trading as Duncan Solutions
Australia) Enterprise Agreement 2015.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the
Reino International Pty Ltd (trading as Duncan Solutions Australia) Enterprise Agreement
2015 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009
(the Act). The agreement is a single-enterprise agreement.
[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss186, 187 and 188 as are relevant to
this application for approval have been met.
[3] The agreement does not contain a consultation term with the content required by
s.205(1) and (1A). Accordingly, in accordance with s.205(2), the model consultation term
contained in Schedule 2.3 of the Fair Work Regulations 2009 is taken to be a term of the
agreement.
[4] The Agreement is approved. In accordance with s.54(1) it will operate from
28 January 2016. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 28 January 2019.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code C, AE417517 PR576312>
- AGLC
- Reino International Pty Ltd [2016] FWCA 418
- Case
- [2016] FWCA 418
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues before the court were whether the application met the requirements of sections 186, 187, and 188 of the Fair Work Act 2009, as well as whether the agreement contained a consultation term as required by section 205(1) and (1A). If not, whether the model consultation term contained in Schedule 2.3 of the Fair Work Regulations 2009 would be deemed to be a term of the agreement.
The Deputy President found that the application met the requirements of sections 186, 187, and 188 of the Fair Work Act 2009. However, the agreement did not contain a consultation term with the required content as per section 205(1) and (1A). Therefore, in accordance with section 205(2), the model consultation term contained in Schedule 2.3 of the Fair Work Regulations 2009 was deemed to be a term of the agreement. The Deputy President approved the agreement, which would operate from January 28, 2016, with a nominal expiry date of January 28, 2019.
This decision highlights the importance of ensuring that enterprise agreements meet the legal requirements set out in the Fair Work Act 2009 and the Fair Work Regulations 2009. It also demonstrates the court's willingness to deem a model consultation term to be a term of the agreement if the required content is not included in the agreement.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.