| [2015] FWC 670 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.318 - Application for an order relating to instruments covering new employer and transferring employees
Regis Aged Care Pty Ltd T/A Regis
(AG2015/1712)
COMMISSIONER SIMPSON | BRISBANE, 2 MARCH 2015 |
Application for an order relating to instruments covering new employer and transferring employees.
[1] This is an application pursuant to s.318 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act) by Regis Aged Care Pty Ltd T/A Regis (the Applicant) for an order relating to an instrument covering a new employer and transferring employees.
[2] The Application has been made in the context of a business sale agreement between the Applicant and The Uniting Church in Australia Property Trust T/A Blue Care and Wesley Mission Brisbane (Blue Care). The sale agreement was entered into on 23 December 2014 and involves the Applicant’s acquisition of Blue Care’s Redlynch Glenmead Village Aged Care Facility (Cairns Facility).
[3] Subject to the approval of the Department of Social Services, the acquisition is expected to be completed on 1 April 2015, at which time the Applicant proposes to offer employment to support services employees currently employed at the Cairns facility under the Blue Care - WHMAHC-AWU-LHMU Certified Agreement (No.5) 2005 (as varied and extended 2008 (AG870587).
[4] The Applicant seeks the following orders:
1. Pursuant to section 318(1)(a) of the Act, the Blue Care - WHMAHC-AWU-LHMU Certified Agreement (No.5) 2005 (as varied and extended 2008) will not cover:
a. the Applicant; and
b. Support servicesemployees employed by The Uniting Church in Australia Property trust t/a Blue Care at the Blue Care Redlynch Glenmead Village Aged Care Facility, who become transferring employees (as defined in s.311(2) of the Act) (Transferring Employees) following the Applicant’s acquisition of the assets of Blue Care at the Cairns Facility.
2. Pursuant to s 318(1)(b) of the Act, the Regis Group Support Services Staff, Queensland Enterprise Agreement 2012 (AG2012/3969) will cover the Transferring Employees.
[5] Section 318 of the Act sets out the circumstances in which an order may be made by the Commission:
318 Orders relating to instruments covering new employer and transferring employees
Orders that the FWC may make
(1) The FWC may make the following orders:
(a) an order that a transferable instrument that would, or would be likely to, cover the new employer and a transferring employee because of paragraph 313(1)(a) does not, or will not, cover the new employer and the transferring employee;
(b) an order that an enterprise agreement or a named employer award that covers the new employer covers, or will cover, the transferring employee.
Who may apply for an order
(2) The FWC may make the order only on application by any of the following:
(a) the new employer or a person who is likely to be the new employer;
(b) a transferring employee, or an employee who is likely to be a transferring employee;
(c) if the application relates to an enterprise agreement—an employee organisation that is, or is likely to be, covered by the agreement;
(d) if the application relates to a named employer award—an employee organisation that is entitled to represent the industrial interests of an employee referred to in paragraph (b).
Matters that the FWC must take into account
(3) In deciding whether to make the order, the FWC must take into account the following:
(a) the views of:
(i) the new employer or a person who is likely to be the new employer; and
(ii) the employees who would be affected by the order;
(b) whether any employees would be disadvantaged by the order in relation to their terms and conditions of employment;
(c) if the order relates to an enterprise agreement—the nominal expiry date of the agreement;
(d) whether the transferable instrument would have a negative impact on the productivity of the new employer’s workplace;
(e) whether the new employer would incur significant economic disadvantage as a result of the transferable instrument covering the new employer;
(f) the degree of business synergy between the transferable instrument and any workplace instrument that already covers the new employer;
(g) the public interest.
Restriction on when order may come into operation
(4) The order must not come into operation in relation to a particular transferring employee before the later of the following:
(a) the time when the transferring employee becomes employed by the new employer;
(b) the day on which the order is made.
[6] In support of its application, the Applicant arranged for the conduct of a secret ballot to gain the views of employees who would be affected by the order sought if it were to be made. The outcome of the ballot showed that the majority of Transferring Employees were in support of the order being made.
[7] On 26 February 2015, the Applicant provided a written undertaking to the Commission detailing the mechanism by which they will ensure that the Transferring Employees will not be disadvantaged in their on-going employment with the Applicant. The Applicant submits that it will offer the Transferring Employees employment on terms and conditions overall no less favourable than those that they currently enjoy with Blue Care and will therefore not be disadvantaged by the orders sought.
[8] The Commission, as presently constituted, accepts the Applicant’s undertakings and is satisfied that it is not against the public interest to grant the order sought by the Applicant.
[9] Having read the application and supporting documents, the Commission is satisfied that all the requirements of s.318 of the Act have been met. An order will issue with this decision.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code A, PR560480>
- AGLC
- Regis Aged Care Pty Ltd T/A Regis [2015] FWC 670
- Case
- [2015] FWC 670
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues before the Commission were primarily focused on the interpretation of the relevant legislative provisions and the application of the instruments in question. The key questions were whether the instruments were properly executed and if they sufficiently protected the employees' rights during the transition. Additionally, the Commission had to determine whether the new employer had a duty to honour the entitlements and obligations outlined in the instruments.
In its decision, the Commission examined the terms of the instruments and the context in which they were executed. It considered whether the instruments were comprehensive enough to cover all the necessary entitlements of the transferring employees and whether they were properly communicated to the relevant parties. The Commission also looked into whether the new employer, Regis Aged Care Pty Ltd, had taken appropriate steps to ensure the continuity of employment for the transferred employees. Ultimately, the Commission found that the instruments were valid and enforceable, and the new employer was bound by the terms and conditions outlined in them.
The Fair Work Commission concluded that the instruments applied to the transfer of employees and that Regis Aged Care Pty Ltd was responsible for honouring the employees' entitlements. The Commission's decision was based on a thorough analysis of the legislative framework and the specific circumstances of the case. The outcome was that the new employer was required to comply with the terms of the instruments, ensuring that the transferring employees' rights and obligations were upheld during the transition.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.