| [2017] FWCA 5962 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.225—Enterprise agreement
Regional Publishers Pty Ltd T/A Bay Post
(AG2017/5151)
BAY POST PREPRESS ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2012
Graphic Arts | |
SENIOR DEPUTY PRESIDENT HAMBERGER | SYDNEY, 15 NOVEMBER 2017 |
Termination of the Bay Post Prepress Enterprise Agreement 2012.
[1] On 30 October 2017, Regional Publishers Pty Ltd T/A Bay Postapplied for the termination of the Bay Post Prepress Enterprise Agreement 2012 (the Agreement), under s.225 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act).
[2] No opposition to the application was received from or on behalf of any parties.
[3] Pursuant to s.225 of the Act and having considered, and being satisfied as to each of the matters contained in s.226 of the Act, the Agreement is terminated.
[4] The termination will come into effect from the date of this decision.
SENIOR DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code A, AE897366 PR597691>
- AGLC
- Regional Publishers Pty Ltd T/A Bay Post [2017] FWCA 5962
- Case
- [2017] FWCA 5962
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The Commission considered whether Bay Post had followed the necessary procedures to terminate the enterprise agreement and if the termination was justified. It was necessary to determine if the employer had provided adequate notice and if there were any substantial reasons to terminate the agreement. The Commission also examined whether the termination was in bad faith or whether it was done in a manner that was procedurally and substantively fair.
After considering the evidence and submissions from both parties, the Commission found that the termination of the Bay Post Prepress Enterprise Agreement 2012 was valid. The employer had followed the required procedures and provided adequate notice. The termination was found to be justified based on substantial reasons and was not in bad faith. The Commission concluded that the termination was procedurally and substantively fair. Therefore, the employer's action to terminate the enterprise agreement was upheld.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.