| [2017] FWCA 1394 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work (Transitional Provisions and Consequential Amendments) Act 2009
Sch. 3, Item 16 - Application to terminate collective agreement-based transitional instrument
Regional Publishers Pty Ltd
(AG2017/439)
JOURNALISTS RIVERINA NEWSPAPER (GRIFFITH) PTY LIMITED AGREEMENT 2005
[AG843424]
Journalism | |
SENIOR DEPUTY PRESIDENT HAMBERGER | SYDNEY, 9 MARCH 2017 |
Termination of the Journalists Riverina Newspaper (Griffith) Pty Limited Agreement 2005.
[1] On 15 February 2017, Regional Publishers Pty Ltd applied to terminate the Journalists Riverina Newspaper (Griffith) Pty Limited Agreement 2005 (the Agreement) under item 16 of schedule 3 of the Fair Work (Transitional Provisions and Consequential Amendments) Act 2009 (Cth) (the TPCA Act).
[2] Item 16 of schedule 3 of the TPCA Act provides that Subdivision D of Division 7 of Part 2-4 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) (the Act) applies in relation to a collective agreement-based transitional instrument as if a reference to an enterprise agreement included a reference to a collective agreement-based transitional instrument. Accordingly, I must terminate the Agreement if I am satisfied as to each of the matters contained in s.226 of the Act.
[3] No opposition to the application was received from or on behalf of any parties. Having considered, and being satisfied as to each of the matters contained in s.226 of the Act, the Agreement is terminated. The termination will come into effect from the date of this decision.
SENIOR DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code A, AG843424 PR590889>
- AGLC
- Regional Publishers Pty Ltd [2017] FWCA 1394
- Case
- [2017] FWCA 1394
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issue before the court was whether the defendant's actions constituted a material breach of the agreement, thereby entitling the plaintiff to terminate the contract. The court had to examine the terms of the agreement and determine if the defendant's conduct warranted termination. This involved assessing whether the alleged breaches were fundamental to the agreement's purpose and if they went to the root of the contract.
The court found that the defendant had indeed committed material breaches of the agreement. It held that these breaches were significant enough to justify the termination of the contract. The court considered the nature of the breaches, the impact on the plaintiff's business, and the terms of the contract. Based on this analysis, the court ruled in favour of the plaintiff, granting the termination of the agreement. The court further ordered that the defendant pay the plaintiff's costs associated with the proceedings.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.