Reeves v Icon Group Constructions Pty Ltd and Bazzi
Case
•
[2025] NSWCATCD 129
•30 October 2025
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Reeves v Icon Group Constructions Pty Ltd and Bazzi [2025] NSWCATCD 129
[2025] NSWCATCD 129
30 October 2025
CaseChat Overview and Summary
Reeves v Icon Group Constructions Pty Ltd and Bazzi is a matter concerning a home building dispute where the applicants sought damages for major defects in their new home, alleging a breach of statutory warranties under the Home Building Act 1989. The respondents, Icon Group Constructions Pty Ltd and Samer Bazzi, were the builders and a design and building practitioner respectively. The applicants argued that the defects constituted a breach of the statutory warranty concerning major defects and that the respondents failed in their duty to exercise reasonable care as required by the Design and Building Practitioners Act 2020.
The court was required to determine the meaning of “if it is constructed for use in conjunction with a dwelling” in Schedule 1 clause 3(2) of the Home Building Act and whether the alleged defects constituted major defects under the Act. Additionally, the court needed to ascertain whether the respondents breached their statutory duty to exercise reasonable care under the Design and Building Practitioners Act 2020.
In resolving the issues, the court examined the statutory provisions and considered the evidence presented regarding the nature and impact of the defects. The court found that the defects did indeed constitute major defects under the Act and that the respondents failed to exercise reasonable care in their design and construction processes. Consequently, the court held that the respondents were jointly and severally liable for the damages claimed by the applicants. The court ordered the respondents to pay $500,000.00 in damages and also ordered them to pay the applicants’ costs of the proceedings.
The final orders of the court mandated that Icon Group Constructions Pty Ltd and Samer Bazzi were to pay the applicants $500,000.00 by way of damages immediately. Furthermore, the court ordered the respondents to pay the applicants’ costs of the proceedings, as agreed or assessed, on the ordinary basis. This decision underscores the importance of adherence to statutory obligations in home building and the consequences of failing to meet these standards.
The court was required to determine the meaning of “if it is constructed for use in conjunction with a dwelling” in Schedule 1 clause 3(2) of the Home Building Act and whether the alleged defects constituted major defects under the Act. Additionally, the court needed to ascertain whether the respondents breached their statutory duty to exercise reasonable care under the Design and Building Practitioners Act 2020.
In resolving the issues, the court examined the statutory provisions and considered the evidence presented regarding the nature and impact of the defects. The court found that the defects did indeed constitute major defects under the Act and that the respondents failed to exercise reasonable care in their design and construction processes. Consequently, the court held that the respondents were jointly and severally liable for the damages claimed by the applicants. The court ordered the respondents to pay $500,000.00 in damages and also ordered them to pay the applicants’ costs of the proceedings.
The final orders of the court mandated that Icon Group Constructions Pty Ltd and Samer Bazzi were to pay the applicants $500,000.00 by way of damages immediately. Furthermore, the court ordered the respondents to pay the applicants’ costs of the proceedings, as agreed or assessed, on the ordinary basis. This decision underscores the importance of adherence to statutory obligations in home building and the consequences of failing to meet these standards.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Consumer Law
Legal Concepts
-
Breach of Contract
-
Unconscionable Conduct
-
Compensatory Damages
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Cases Citing This Decision
0
Cases Cited
6
Statutory Material Cited
3
The Owners - Strata Plan No 87060 v Loulach Developments Pty Ltd (No 2)
[2021] NSWSC 1068
The Owners - Strata Plan No 84674 v Pafburn Pty Ltd
[2022] NSWSC 659
Bellgrove v Eldridge
[1954] HCA 36