Rees and Rees (Child support)

The case of *Rees and Rees (Child Support)* concerned a dispute between the parties regarding the percentage of care for their child. The applicant sought to have existing percentage of care determinations revoked and new determinations made, alleging a change in the likely pattern of care. The court was required to consider whether the applicant had taken reasonable action to comply with existing court orders and whether an interim period had been correctly applied.

The primary legal issue before the court was whether the circumstances warranted a revocation of the existing percentage of care determinations and the making of new ones. This involved an assessment of whether there had been a material change in the likely pattern of care for the child. The court also had to determine if the applicant's actions constituted reasonable steps towards complying with prior court orders concerning the child's care arrangements.

In its reasoning, the court affirmed the decision under review. It found that the applicant had indeed taken reasonable action in attempting to comply with the existing court orders. Furthermore, the court determined that the interim period had been correctly applied in the assessment of care. Consequently, the court upheld the existing determinations, finding no sufficient basis to revoke them and make new ones based on the evidence presented.