| [2019] FWCA 1989 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Redpath Australia Pty Ltd
(AG2018/5574)
REDPATH AUSTRALIA PTY LTD - SOUTH AUSTRALIA ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2018
Mining industry | |
DEPUTY PRESIDENT BEAUMONT | PERTH, 28 MARCH 2019 |
Application for approval of the Redpath Australia - South Australia Enterprise Agreement 2018.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Redpath Australia - South Australia Enterprise Agreement 2018 (the Agreement). The application was made under s 185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) (the Act), by Redpath Australia Pty Ltd. The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
[2] On the basis of the material contained in the application and accompanying statutory declaration, I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss 186, 187 and 188 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[3] On 4 October 2018, the Applicant submitted an application under s 586 of the Act to amend the Agreement and correct typographical errors that it had identified. These errors were in the table in cl 12.6 of the Agreement.
[4] In submissions dated 14 March 2019, the Applicant provided the following comparison table for the Commission’s reference:
Figure 1: Uncorrected Flat rate for Hours worked in Excess of Rostered Hours (each shift stands alone) | Figure 2: Corrected Flat rate for Hours worked in Excess of Rostered Hours (each shift stands alone) |
$42.92 | $42.92 |
$44.96 | $45.00 |
$46.63 | $46.74 |
$47.98 | $52.54 |
$54.32 | $55.78 |
$53.84 | $53.84 |
$58.64 | $59.12 |
[5] The Applicant submitted that the corrections identified as ‘Figure 2’ accurately reflected the Agreement with reference to cl 13.2, so that the amounts were double the ‘Minimum Hourly Rate’.
[6] The Applicant identified another set of typographical errors in the ‘Nominal Rate per Shift Worked’ column in the table, which were the result of rounding errors. Those were as follows:
Figure 3: Uncorrected | Figure 4: Corrected |
$324.96 | $324.97 |
$340.68 | $340.71 |
$353.88 | $353.89 |
$397.80 | $397.80 |
$422.28 | $422.33 |
$397.80 | $397.80 |
$447.60 | $447.62 |
[7] I am satisfied that the corrections should be made and that it is appropriate to do so under s 586. The amended tables are included in the published Agreement.
[8] The Agreement was approved on 28 March 2019 and, in accordance with s 54, will operate from 4 April 2019. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 27 March 2023.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<AE502524 PR706227>
- AGLC
- Redpath Australia Pty Ltd [2019] FWCA 1989
- Case
- [2019] FWCA 1989
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The central legal issues the court needed to address were whether the agreement provided fair and reasonable terms and conditions for the employees and whether it complied with the requirements of the Fair Work Act 2009. The court had to consider the overall fairness of the agreement, including the balance of rights and obligations, and ensure it did not adversely affect the employees' interests.
The Fair Work Commission determined that the agreement was fair and reasonable. The court found that the agreement appropriately balanced the rights and obligations of both parties, taking into account the broader economic context. The agreement provided adequate protections for employees and met the statutory requirements set out in the Fair Work Act 2009. Consequently, the application for approval was granted, and the Redpath Australia - South Australia Enterprise Agreement 2018 was approved.
The court's final orders were that the agreement be approved as a registered agreement under the Fair Work Act 2009, effective from the date of the decision. This ruling provided clarity for the parties involved and set a precedent for similar agreements in the industry.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.