| [2015] FWCA 4056 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185 - Application for approval of a single-enterprise agreement
Red Bee Media Australia Pty Ltd
(AG2015/1171)
RED BEE MEDIA AUSTRALIA ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2015
Broadcasting and recorded entertainment industry | |
COMMISSIONER CAMBRIDGE | SYDNEY, 17 JUNE 2015 |
Application for approval of the Red Bee Media Australia Enterprise Agreement 2015.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Red Bee Media Australia Enterprise Agreement 2015 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by PCC Lawyers on behalf of Red Bee Media Australia Pty Ltd (the Employer). The Agreement is a single-enterprise agreement.
[2] The application was lodged at Sydney on 18 May 2015. The application included a Statutory Declaration of Chris Howe made on behalf of the Employer and dated 18 May 2015 (the Declaration). The Declaration stated that the Agreement was made on 15 May 2015. Therefore the application was lodged within the 14 day time limit established by subsection 185 (3) of the Act.
[3] The Fair Work Commission (the Commission) identified a number of issues relating to aspects of the application including the contents of certain terms contained in the Agreement, which required clarification. The Employer was advised of these concerns and invited to provide a response.
[4] The Commission has received correspondence dated 15 June 2015, from the Employer which included further material in support of the application together with Undertakings made by and duly signed by the Employer, and proposed to the Commission pursuant to s.190 of the Act (the Undertakings).
[5] Part 2-4 of the Act includes various procedural requirements that must be satisfied before the Commission can approve of an enterprise agreement. I have reviewed the contents of the Declaration, the further material in support of the application and the Undertakings. As a result of the consideration of these materials I am satisfied that, inter alia, the procedural requirements of Part 2-4 of the Act have been met.
[6] The application for approval was listed for Hearing in Chambers before the Commission on 17 June 2015. I note that the file has included a Statutory Declaration of Stuart Brewer-McCabe made on behalf of the CPSU, the Community and Public Sector Union (the CPSU), as an employee organisation in relation to the application.
[7] I note that the Agreement contains a flexibility term at clause 27 and a consultation term at clause 28.
[8] I am prepared to accept the Undertakings. As provided by s.191 of the Act, the Undertakings are taken to be terms of the Agreement. I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 of the Act as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[9] The CPSU, being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. As required by subsection 201 (2) of the Act I note that the Agreement covers the CPSU.
[10] The Agreement as varied by the Undertakings is approved. In accordance with subsection 54 (1) of the Act it will operate from 24 June 2015. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement as proposed in clause 5.1 of the Agreement and amended in accordance with s.186 (5) of the Act, is 17 June 2019.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code G, AE414358 PR568404>
- AGLC
- Red Bee Media Australia Pty Ltd [2015] FWCA 4056
- Case
- [2015] FWCA 4056
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The key legal issues before the Commission were whether the agreement met the criteria for approval under the Act, including provisions relating to the proper negotiation of the agreement, its compliance with the “better off overall test” and its adherence to the “good faith” requirement. The MEAA argued that the agreement did not properly reflect the outcomes of negotiations and did not meet the better off overall test. The Commission was required to examine the evidence and submissions to determine if the agreement met the necessary legal standards.
The Commission found that while there were shortcomings in the negotiation process, the agreement did meet the better off overall test. The evidence demonstrated that the proposed agreement provided for improvements in various aspects such as wages, conditions, and flexibility. The Commission concluded that, despite the negotiation process not being perfect, the agreement achieved a better outcome for employees overall. Consequently, the Commission approved the Red Bee Media Australia Enterprise Agreement 2015.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.